Skip to main content

Is renren.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 成都人人互娱科技有限公司 Reviews

成

Is renren.com Safe? Security Analysis for 成都人人互娱科技有限公司

https://renren.com

Check if renren.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinamedium
HTML5CSS3Responsive Design
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 8:47:13 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

人人网由成都人人互娱科技有限公司运营，是一家成立于1999年的中国社交网络平台，致力于为广大用户提供稳定安全的社交体验。网站内容主要展示服务升级公告及公司联系信息，面向普通大众用户。技术基础较为传统，采用HTML5和CSS3实现响应式设计，移动端优化良好。托管于阿里云，域名注册历史悠久，显示业务稳定性较高。安全方面，网站缺少安全相关HTTP头部和公开的安全政策，未见隐私政策和Cookie政策，合规性不足，存在改进空间。整体风险中等，建议加强安全防护和合规披露以提升用户信任和业务稳健性。

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3Responsive Design

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

人人网作为中国知名社交平台，拥有较长的市场历史和稳定的用户基础。其业务模式为社交网络服务，目标客户为普通互联网用户。公司通过持续的服务升级保持市场竞争力，但缺乏公开的隐私和安全政策可能影响用户信任。未发现合作伙伴或子公司信息，托管于阿里云，符合中国互联网企业常见架构。未来可通过完善合规体系和安全管理提升市场地位和用户满意度。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

j*****@infinities.com.cn

Phone Numbers (1)

010*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

当前安全成熟度较低，网站未启用DNSSEC，缺少安全HTTP头部，未公开安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道。无明显敏感数据泄露或漏洞迹象，但缺乏透明的安全管理和合规披露。建议尽快部署安全头部，启用DNSSEC，公开隐私政策和安全响应联系方式，提升整体安全防护和合规水平，降低潜在风险。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

启用DNSSEC以增强域名安全防护

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

成都人人互娱科技有限公司

Description:

人人网是一家社交网络平台，提供社交服务，面向广大用户，致力于打造稳定安全的社交体验。

Key Services:
社交网络服务
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3Responsive Design
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

网站为人人网官方主页，内容为服务升级公告及公司联系信息。

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@qiye.163.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.renren.com
Issuer:RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1
Valid Until:1/9/2026 (159 days)
SANs:*.renren.com, renren.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

No MX Records

LOW

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(195 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • •No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:120.41.32.41, 171.214.23.41, 180.97.198.41, 182.240.161.41, 183.60.227.41, 60.188.66.41, 61.170.99.41, 111.170.25.41, 111.225.213.41, 117.33.185.41
AAAA Records:240e:950:4:1::710e:6029, 240e:908:8001:100::2a65:3829, 240e:97d:10:2001::b73c:e329, 240e:b1:9801:207::6fe1:d529, 240e:cf:9000:307::b66a:9e29, 240e:918:8004:1::1b4:cd29, 240e:93e:3:112::1c2:fd29, 240e:974:c200:d00::abd6:1729, 240e:96c:6400:d05::3daa:6329, 240e:954:0:11::718e:cf29
Name Servers:
kama.dnspod.net
lake.dnspod.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:380ms

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用基础HTML5和CSS3技术，结构简洁，支持响应式设计，移动端表现良好。托管于阿里云，域名注册历史悠久，显示技术基础稳定。缺少现代安全防护措施和SEO优化，未使用明显的CMS或框架。性能适中，无明显技术债务，但存在提升空间。建议引入现代前端框架和安全技术，完善SEO和无障碍支持，提升整体技术成熟度。
Analyze Another Website