Skip to main content

Is rentguru.io a Scam? Security Check Results - rentguru.io Reviews

R

Is rentguru.io Safe? Security Analysis for rentguru.io

Check if rentguru.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
ReactGoogle AdSense
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 10:55:08 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at rentguru.io/lander is a minimal landing or parking page with very limited content and no visible business information or contact details. The domain is registered via GoDaddy with privacy protection, which obscures registrant details. The site uses React technology and includes Google AdSense scripts, indicating some monetization intent, but lacks substantive content or user engagement features. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies and lack of contact information significantly reduce the site's credibility and compliance posture. Technically, the site does not provide evidence of HTTPS or security headers, which are critical for secure web presence. Overall, the site appears to be either under development or a placeholder with minimal business activity.

Detected Technologies

ReactGoogle AdSense

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the minimal content and lack of business information, it is difficult to ascertain the market positioning or business model of rentguru.io. The domain age suggests it has been registered since 2018, but the current landing page does not reflect active business operations or services. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators. The use of Google AdSense suggests some advertising revenue model, but no direct customer engagement or service offerings are evident.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak given the lack of HTTPS information and absence of security headers. No forms or inputs are present to assess secure data handling. The domain is privacy protected and locked, which is common but reduces transparency. No incident response or security policies are found. The site is vulnerable to trust issues due to minimal security best practices and lack of compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactGoogle AdSense
Frameworks:
PW (Possibly Parking Lander System)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
10/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdSense
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a minimal parking/landing page with almost no content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(255 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:15.197.148.33, 3.33.130.190
Name Servers:
ns47.domaincontrol.com
ns48.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072400, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses React framework and loads scripts from wsimg.com and Google AdSense, indicating a modern but minimal tech stack. The hosting provider is likely GoDaddy based on DNS and registrar data. Performance and mobile optimization are basic due to minimal content. No CMS or advanced platforms detected. SEO and accessibility are poor due to lack of metadata and content. The site appears to be a placeholder or parking page rather than a fully developed business site.
Analyze Another Website