Skip to main content

Is rento3.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Rent O3 Reviews

rento3.lv favicon

Is rento3.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Rent O3

Check if rento3.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressJetpackGutenbergTwemojiJavaScript+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:40:19 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Rent O3 is a Latvian-based small business specializing in the rental of ozone generators for odor removal, disinfection, and cleaning purposes across Latvia. The company offers a range of ozone devices tailored to different room sizes and contamination levels, with convenient delivery options including parcel lockers. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and hosted on WordPress.com, leveraging Jetpack and Gutenberg technologies to provide a modern and responsive user experience. Contact information is clearly provided, although privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly present. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and privacy compliance features. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and targeted at a general audience seeking ozone rental services in Latvia.

Detected Technologies

WordPressJetpackGutenbergTwemojiJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in a niche market segment focused on ozone technology rental for residential and commercial customers in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in offering ecological cleaning solutions without chemicals, with flexible rental options and nationwide delivery. The business model is direct rental with online presence primarily for marketing and customer contact. The website content is relevant and well-structured, supporting customer decision-making with product descriptions and usage guidance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for compliance improvement. The company appears to be a small local player without visible subsidiaries or parent companies. The use of WordPress.com hosting indicates a cost-effective digital infrastructure.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

r*****@gmail.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712636****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact, which are best practices for customer trust and regulatory compliance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional headers, policies, and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Rent O3

Description:

Ozonatoru noma visā Latvijā. Atbrīvojies no deguma, pelējuma, dūmu, dzīvnieku un citiem nevēlamiem aromātiem gan telpās, gan automašīnā.

Key Services:
Ozone generator rentalDelivery via Omniva parcel lockersSupport and consultation on ozone device usage
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressJetpackGutenbergTwemojiJavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
WordPress block editor
Platforms:
WordPress.com hosting
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of WordPress security plugins (Jetpack)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
WordPress.com Stats
Marketing Tools:
JetpackWordPress.com Reader
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress.com hosted site with Jetpack and Gutenberg blocks.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.78.24, 192.0.78.25
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1710102972, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:166ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Gutenberg block editor and Jetpack plugin, hosted on WordPress.com infrastructure. It uses modern web technologies including responsive CSS and JavaScript for interactivity. Performance is moderate with optimized images and lazy loading. Accessibility features such as skip links and semantic HTML are present, contributing to good user experience. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured data for social sharing. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, which are technical gaps. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business site but can be improved in security and compliance aspects.
Analyze Another Website