Skip to main content

Is reputationdefender.com a Scam? Security Check Results - reputationdefender.com Reviews

R

Is reputationdefender.com Safe? Security Analysis for ERROR: The request could not be satisfied

Check if reputationdefender.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 6:47:32 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website reputationdefender.com is currently inaccessible due to a CloudFront-generated 403 error indicating that requests are blocked by a Web Application Firewall or configuration error. This prevents retrieval of any meaningful website content, metadata, or business information. The domain is registered with MarkMonitor Inc. since 2006, indicating a mature and legitimate domain ownership consistent with an established business. However, the lack of accessible content limits the ability to assess the company's services, technical infrastructure, or security posture. The site is hosted behind Amazon AWS CloudFront CDN, which is currently enforcing access restrictions. No privacy, cookie, or security policies are detectable, nor are any contact details or forms available for analysis. The content safety rating is safe given no content is accessible to suggest otherwise. Overall, the site’s digital presence is currently blocked, resulting in a low AI score and incomplete analysis.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the blocked content, detailed business intelligence cannot be extracted. The domain age and registrar suggest an important entity in the technology sector, likely providing reputation management services given the domain name. No information on market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The domain’s longevity supports a stable business presence, but no direct evidence of business operations or customer engagement is visible.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to the lack of accessible content. The presence of a CloudFront WAF blocking access indicates some level of security enforcement, but no security headers or SSL details are visible. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests compliance gaps. Recommendations include ensuring proper configuration to allow legitimate access, publishing security and privacy policies, and implementing comprehensive security headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve CloudFront WAF configuration to allow legitimate user access and reduce false positives.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

CloudFront Detected

403 ERROR page generated by CloudFront indicating request blocked due to WAF or configuration error.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to CloudFront 403 error blocking requests.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:155.64.138.32/29 ip4:166.98.20.16/30 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:2103160.spf06.hubspotemail.net include:_spf.qualtrics.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1280-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:zqtpbcsz@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:zqtpbcsz@fr.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
19 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(300 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.206.72, 3.164.206.52, 3.164.206.127, 3.164.206.13
Name Servers:
ns-1124.awsdns-12.org
ns-1649.awsdns-14.co.uk
ns-330.awsdns-41.com
ns-782.awsdns-33.net
MX Records:
10: reputationdefender-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:39ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:155.64.138.32/29 ip4:166.98.20.16/30 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:2103160.spf06.hubspotemail.net include:_spf.qualtrics.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on Amazon AWS CloudFront CDN, which currently blocks access resulting in a 403 error page. No CMS, frameworks, or scripts are detectable due to blocked content. The domain is well-registered and stable, but the technical implementation cannot be assessed for performance, mobile optimization, or accessibility. The blocking reduces the website’s operational effectiveness and user engagement potential. Technical improvements should focus on resolving WAF rules, enabling HTTPS with proper SSL configuration, and deploying modern web technologies to enhance performance and security.
Analyze Another Website