Skip to main content

Is request.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Request Reviews

request.lv favicon

Is request.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Request

Check if request.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatviasmall
WordPressElementorHubSpot scriptsCloudflareCookieYes consent+3 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:28:30 PM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Request is a small Latvian creative design studio specializing in web design, development, and digital marketing services. Founded in 2022, the company positions itself as a professional service provider transforming client visions into reality through expert web development, social media management, creative design, and e-commerce solutions. The website reflects a modern, well-branded digital presence with comprehensive service showcases and client project portfolios. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging Cloudflare for CDN and bot management, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, and social media pixels. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and bot management, though security headers and explicit security policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a detailed cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned privacy policy. Contact information is clear and consistent with the business claims, enhancing credibility. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but no suspicious indicators are present. Overall, Request demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure and professional business operations suitable for its market niche.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorHubSpot scriptsCloudflareCookieYes consentGoogle AnalyticsTwitter AdsWonderPush

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Request operates in the technology sector as a creative design and digital marketing agency targeting businesses seeking web and digital branding solutions. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored web development and marketing campaigns. The company leverages partnerships with major social media and advertising platforms to enhance client reach. The presence of VAT and registration numbers indicates formal business registration in Latvia. The company maintains active social media profiles across multiple platforms, supporting brand visibility and client engagement. Growth indicators include a diverse project portfolio and use of modern digital marketing tools. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent small business. Strategic observations highlight a focus on quality design and client-centric services, positioning Request as a competitive player in the Latvian creative market.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@request.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712000****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA Request

VAT Number:

LV40203423105

Registration Number:

851974786

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Cloudflare for CDN and bot management, enhancing security and performance. Cookie consent is implemented via CookieYes, providing users control over tracking and data collection, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and incident management. Third-party scripts from HubSpot, Google Analytics, and social media platforms introduce potential risk vectors and require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is good for a small business but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Request

Description:

Creative design studio, specializing in web design, development and advertising. We transform visions into reality with a team of experts in web development, social media management, creative design, and e-commerce solutions.

Key Services:
Web designWeb developmentDigital marketingSocial media managementE-commerce solutions
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorHubSpot scriptsCloudflareCookieYes consentGoogle AnalyticsTwitter AdsWonderPush
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot AnalyticsCloudflare Zaraz
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
FacebookLinkedInRedditBing/Microsoft AdvertisingX (Twitter)
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagCloudflare ZarazWonderPush
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotCookieYesWonderPush
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@request.lv
Forensic Reports:c2348e882d@ruf.easydmarc.eu

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:request.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/8/2025 (39 days)
SANs:request.lv, *.request.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.70.233, 172.67.168.190
AAAA Records:2a06:98c1:3120::1, 2a06:98c1:3121::1
Name Servers:
isabel.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
rocco.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2378228220, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:287ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder framework, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. Hosting and CDN services are provided by Cloudflare, which also offers bot management capabilities. The site integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot, Google Analytics, Twitter Ads, Facebook Pixel, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and slideshow features implemented. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, supported by responsive design and semantic HTML. SEO is enhanced by Rank Math plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Cards. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external scripts which require ongoing maintenance and security review. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust for a small creative agency but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website