Skip to main content

Is resellerratings.com a Scam? Security Check Results - resellerratings.com Reviews

resellerratings.com favicon

Is resellerratings.com Safe? Security Analysis for Store Ratings & Reviews | ResellerRatings.com | Find Trusted Stores

Check if resellerratings.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceN/amedium
JavaScriptReact (implied by React devtools hook)Google AdsenseFacebook SDKHubSpot Feedback and Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 12:07:35 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ResellerRatings.com operates as an e-commerce review and price comparison platform, providing consumers with verified store ratings and customer reviews to aid in informed purchasing decisions. The website targets online shoppers seeking trustworthy feedback on stores and products. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript frameworks such as React, integrates with multiple marketing and analytics services including Google Adsense, Facebook SDK, and HubSpot, and is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, contributing to a positive user experience. However, the security posture shows gaps, notably the absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, while the platform appears functional and professionally designed, improvements in security and privacy compliance are recommended to enhance credibility and reduce risk.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptReact (implied by React devtools hook)Google AdsenseFacebook SDKHubSpot Feedback and AnalyticsLaunchNotes embed

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ResellerRatings.com positions itself in the competitive e-commerce sector as a trusted source for store reviews and price comparisons. Its business model revolves around aggregating verified customer feedback and facilitating product price comparisons, likely monetized through advertising networks such as Google Adsense and affiliate marketing. The platform appeals primarily to consumers seeking reliable information before making online purchases. The integration of marketing tools like HubSpot and G2 Crowd tracking indicates a focus on customer engagement and lead generation. The absence of detailed company information and registrant data limits full assessment of business scale and partnerships. Nonetheless, the site maintains consistent branding and a clear value proposition within the retail technology industry.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks evidence of comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS, which are essential to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security or incident response policies are found, nor are there contact channels dedicated to security issues. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential attack surfaces, necessitating vigilant library management and vulnerability assessments. The missing WHOIS data and absence of privacy and cookie policies further weaken the security and compliance posture. While no immediate vulnerabilities are detected in the provided content, the site would benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparent privacy disclosures to align with GDPR and other regulations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Compare prices and read store reviews by real customers, compare products.

Key Services:
store ratingscustomer reviewsprice comparison
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptReact (implied by React devtools hook)Google AdsenseFacebook SDKHubSpot Feedback and AnalyticsLaunchNotes embed
Frameworks:
React
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
HubSpot AnalyticsScorecard Research
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelHubSpot Ads PixelScorecard Research
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot FeedbackLaunchNotesG2 Crowd Attribution Tracking
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible recent registration or privacy protection

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:rp.oracleemaildelivery.com include:spf.dynect.net include:2327263.spf08.hubspotemail.net include:email.chargebee.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:5f0023d6e7@rua.easydmarc.us
Forensic Reports:5f0023d6e7@ruf.easydmarc.us

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(301 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.85.49.126, 52.85.49.44, 52.85.49.79, 52.85.49.101
Name Servers:
ns-1352.awsdns-41.org
ns-168.awsdns-21.com
ns-1955.awsdns-52.co.uk
ns-988.awsdns-59.net
MX Records:
0: resellerratings-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:rp.oracleemaildelivery.com include:spf.dynect.net include:2327263.spf08.hubspotemail.net include:email.chargebee.com include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies, including React for frontend rendering and AWS for hosting, indicating a scalable and maintainable infrastructure. Integration with marketing and analytics platforms such as HubSpot, Facebook SDK, and Google Adsense suggests a mature digital marketing strategy. The site is mobile-optimized and employs responsive design principles. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Performance appears moderate, with potential for optimization in script loading and resource management. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO practices are adequately implemented through meta tags and structured data. Technical debt appears minimal but could be reduced by consolidating third-party dependencies and enhancing security configurations.
Analyze Another Website