Skip to main content

Is reseni.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Petr Vymětal – Studio digitálních řešení Reviews

reseni.net favicon

Is reseni.net Safe? Security Analysis for Petr Vymětal – Studio digitálních řešení

Check if reseni.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyCzech Republicsmall
jQuery 3.6.0jQuery Migrate 1.4.1Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerTypekit Fonts
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 2:59:49 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.reseni.net represents a small freelance digital solutions studio operated by Petr Vymětal, offering internet applications, digital photography, and graphic design services primarily to clients in the Czech Republic. The business model is based on freelance project work with a focus on simplicity and tailored solutions. The site is professionally designed, mobile responsive, and uses modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing WHOIS domain registration data, introduces concerns about compliance and legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking security headers and incident response contacts. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer domain registration transparency.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.6.0jQuery Migrate 1.4.1Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerTypekit Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets small and medium enterprises and individual clients within the Czech Republic, leveraging over 20 years of experience in digital services. The freelance model allows flexibility and close client collaboration. Partnerships with a graphic designer and a linkbuilding consultant indicate a small ecosystem of collaborators. The website content is clear and relevant, supporting the business positioning as a trusted local provider. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts in programming, photography, and graphic design. The lack of visible certifications or formal trust badges suggests a reliance on reputation and direct client relationships.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@reseni.net

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, which may impact GDPR compliance. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small freelance site but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Petr Vymětal – Studio digitálních řešení

Description:

Poskytuje služby v oblasti programování internetových aplikací, digitální fotografie a grafických návrhů s více než 20 lety praxe. Pracuje jako freelancer a spolupracuje s dalšími specialisty.

Key Services:
Internetové aplikaceDigitální fotografieGrafické návrhy
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.6.0jQuery Migrate 1.4.1Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerTypekit Fonts
Frameworks:
SPR-Machine (generator meta tag)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS implied by URL (https://www.reseni.net/)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spf.blueboard.cz -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:reseni.net
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:9/12/2025 (42 days)
SANs:*.reseni.net, reseni.net

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(146 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:178.251.187.9
AAAA Records:2a00:1ed0:45::15
Name Servers:
ns2.blueboard.cz
shinzon.blueboard.cz
MX Records:
10: mx.blueboard.cz
SOA:Serial: 2020092196, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:39ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spf.blueboard.cz -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with standard HTML5 and CSS3, enhanced by jQuery 3.6.0 and jQuery Migrate for legacy support. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit. The site is mobile responsive with media queries and uses fixed header navigation. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains a clear structure and navigation. Technical debt appears low, but security and privacy technical implementations need enhancement.
Analyze Another Website