Skip to main content

Is rexx-systems.com a Scam? Security Check Results - rexx-systems.com Reviews

rexx-systems.com favicon

Is rexx-systems.com Safe? Security Analysis for Innovative Software, die Mittelstand & Konzerne begeistert

Check if rexx-systems.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
JavaScriptRocket Lazy Load ScriptsGoogle Tag ManagerElementorJet Plugins
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:05:24 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website represents a technology company specializing in innovative software solutions aimed at medium-sized businesses and large corporations. The site is built on WordPress using Elementor and includes modern web technologies and advertising/tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Piwik. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. The website lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is weak due to missing security headers and unclear SSL/TLS configuration. Overall, the site is accessible and professionally designed but requires significant improvements in security, compliance, and transparency to enhance trust and credibility.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptRocket Lazy Load ScriptsGoogle Tag ManagerElementorJet Plugins

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets the enterprise software market, focusing on HR and digital transformation solutions for medium and large businesses. The business model appears to be B2B software provision, though specific revenue streams and partnerships are not disclosed. The website content is business-oriented but lacks detailed company information, certifications, or trust signals. Advertising practices include major ad networks and tracking services, indicating active marketing efforts. The lack of registrant data and contact details limits confidence in the business's operational transparency.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@rexx-systems.com

Phone Numbers (3)

+4940890****
+4318905***
+4144433****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low based on the available data. The site uses HTTPS but lacks security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is provided. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further weakens compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The site should prioritize implementing security best practices, transparent data protection policies, and incident response mechanisms to reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Website appears to represent a software company targeting medium-sized businesses and corporations with innovative software solutions.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptRocket Lazy Load ScriptsGoogle Tag ManagerElementorJet Plugins
Frameworks:
Elementor
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Piwik
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing AdsGoogle AdsLinkedIn Ads
Tracking Pixels:
PiwikLeadinfoLeadrebel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:85.25.89.5/32 ip4:91.250.95.64/26 ip4:213.95.153.112/28 ip4:85.25.89.18/32 include:inxserver.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@rexx-systems.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@rexx-systems.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 16 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:213.95.153.113, 213.95.153.122
Name Servers:
ns1.routing.netDNS only
ns2.routing.netDNS only
ns3.routing.netDNS only
pdns02.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx002.rexx-systems.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090401, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:212ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:85.25.89.5/32 ip4:91.250.95.64/26 ip4:213.95.153.112/28 ip4:85.25.89.18/32 include:inxserver.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses various JavaScript libraries and lazy loading scripts to optimize performance. Advertising and tracking scripts from Google, Bing, LinkedIn, and others are integrated. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, no hosting provider or CDN information is explicitly detected. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present. Technical improvements could focus on enhancing security configurations, improving privacy compliance, and optimizing analytics data handling.
Analyze Another Website