Skip to main content

Is rgbtohex.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Dan's Tools Reviews

rgbtohex.net favicon

Is rgbtohex.net Safe? Security Analysis for Dan's Tools

Check if rgbtohex.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
jQuery 3.5.1Moment.js 2.29.1Fomantic UI 2.8.8Font Awesome 5.15.1Google Fonts+1 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:33:04 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Dan's Tools operates the website rgbtohex.net, providing free online utilities primarily focused on color code conversion for web developers and designers. The site offers tools such as RGB to HEX conversion, HEX to RGB conversion, and color exploration, positioning itself as a niche resource within the web development community. The business model relies on advertising revenue, with Google AdSense integrated for monetization. The website is small in scale, with a consistent brand presence and content quality rated as good.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.5.1Moment.js 2.29.1Fomantic UI 2.8.8Font Awesome 5.15.1Google FontsGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website targets web developers and designers needing quick and reliable color conversion tools. It leverages partnerships with related utility domains, forming a network of web development resources. The business model is straightforward, offering free tools supported by advertising. The lack of explicit company contact details and WHOIS data suggests a small or privacy-conscious operation. The site has maintained a presence since 2014, indicating stability in its niche. Its competitive advantage lies in simplicity, ease of use, and integration with a broader suite of developer tools.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response contacts limits transparency in vulnerability management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers and documented policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Dan's Tools

Description:

Provides online tools for converting RGB color codes to HEX format and related web development utilities.

Key Services:
RGB to HEX color conversionHEX to RGB conversionColor exploration toolsVarious web development and conversion utilities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.5.1Moment.js 2.29.1Fomantic UI 2.8.8Font Awesome 5.15.1Google FontsGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
Fomantic UI
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent mechanism for cookies

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdSense
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a niche utility tool for color code conversion

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

70/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:34.200.98.251, 34.202.133.59
Name Servers:
ns-1493.awsdns-58.orgDNS only
ns-1923.awsdns-48.co.ukDNS only
ns-206.awsdns-25.comDNS only
ns-809.awsdns-37.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:69ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern frontend stack including jQuery, Moment.js, and Fomantic UI for UI components, along with Font Awesome for icons and Google Fonts for typography. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudfront CDN for static assets, improving performance. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The technical implementation is solid for a small utility site but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website