Skip to main content

Is rgcommerce.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - RG Commerce Reviews

rgcommerce.lv favicon

Is rgcommerce.lv Safe? Security Analysis for RG Commerce

Check if rgcommerce.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
WordPressElementorHouzez themeBootstrapjQuery+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:56:32 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

RG Commerce operates a commercial real estate database platform primarily serving the Latvian market. The website offers listings for rental and sale of various commercial properties including offices, warehouses, retail spaces, and business premises. Positioned as the next largest commercial property database in Latvia, RG Commerce targets businesses and individuals seeking commercial real estate solutions. The platform provides personalized property offers through a user questionnaire, enhancing customer engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Houzez theme and Elementor page builder, leveraging Bootstrap and jQuery for responsive design and interactivity. The site integrates Facebook Pixel for marketing and tracking purposes. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure; however, the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies indicates room for improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorHouzez themeBootstrapjQueryLeaflet.jsFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business focuses on the real estate sector, specifically commercial properties in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive database and specialization in both rental and sales markets. The business model revolves around providing an online platform for property listings and personalized offers, likely generating revenue through listing fees or advertising. Target customers include commercial tenants, property buyers, and real estate professionals. The presence of social media profiles suggests active marketing efforts. Growth indicators include a range of property categories and a user-friendly search interface. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved compliance documentation and clearer contact information to enhance credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or security contact information is provided, which may hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel introduces tracking but no cookie consent mechanism is present, raising privacy concerns under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements in policy transparency and header implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

RG Commerce

Description:

Nākamā lielākā komercīpašumu datubāze Latvijā, kas specializējas nomas un pārdošanas tirgū. Mūsu mērķis ir nodrošināt pārskatu par pieejamajiem īpašumiem.

Key Services:
Commercial property listings for rentCommercial property listings for salePersonalized commercial property offers via questionnaire
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorHouzez themeBootstrapjQueryLeaflet.jsFacebook Pixel
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with POST method

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Facebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEOElementor
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a commercial real estate listing platform focused on Latvian market.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.wpcloud.com ?all v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.mlsend.com ?all v=spf1 include:_spf.wpcloud.com ~all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:?all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.78.232, 192.0.78.158
Name Servers:
ns1.wordpress.comDNS only
ns2.wordpress.comDNS only
ns3.wordpress.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2024032110, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:234ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.wpcloud.com ?all v=spf1 include:_spf.wpcloud.com ~all v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.mlsend.com ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress infrastructure using the Houzez theme tailored for real estate. It employs Elementor for page building and Bootstrap for responsive design, ensuring good mobile optimization. JavaScript libraries include jQuery and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. Facebook Pixel is integrated for marketing analytics. Performance appears moderate with preloading of images and lazy loading techniques. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich search results. Accessibility features are basic but present. No hosting provider details were discernible. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts without visible privacy controls and missing security headers. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website