Skip to main content

Is rgjuvelyrika.lt a Scam? Security Check Results - RG Juvelyrika Reviews

rgjuvelyrika.lt favicon

Is rgjuvelyrika.lt Safe? Security Analysis for RG Juvelyrika

Check if rgjuvelyrika.lt is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLithuaniasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+3 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 9:35:50 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

RG Juvelyrika is a small local jeweler business based in Vilnius, Lithuania, specializing in the manufacturing and repair of gold and silver jewelry, including custom wedding and engagement rings. The website presents a professional image with good customer trust signals such as a 5-star Google rating and multiple positive testimonials. The site supports multiple languages and uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for forms and multilingual support. Technically, the site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with some security best practices, although some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Contact information includes a phone number and a contact form collecting personal data. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned locally but could improve privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsTranslatePress multilingual pluginForminator formsLiteSpeed Cache

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the retail sector focusing on jewelry sales and services. It targets general consumers in Vilnius and surrounding areas seeking quality custom and repair jewelry services. The business model combines direct retail with custom manufacturing and repair services. Positive customer feedback and a strong Google presence indicate a solid market position. The website's multilingual support suggests an intent to serve a broader audience including English and Russian speakers. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company appears to be independently operated with a focus on craftsmanship and customer satisfaction.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@rgjuvelyrika.lt

Phone Numbers (1)

+3706470****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. Security best practices such as use of nonces in forms and cookie consent are implemented. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the security score. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact, which is a gap in security transparency. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

RG Juvelyrika

Description:

Juvelyras Vilniuje. Gaminami unikalūs ir išskirtiniai aukso dirbiniai Vilniuje. Asortimentas apima papuošalus nuo kasdieninių auskarų iki originalių grandinėlių, pakabukų ar žiedų su briliantais. Taip pat individualūs užsakymai sužadėtuvėms, vestuvėms ir kitoms progoms.

Key Services:
Jewelry manufacturingJewelry repairCustom wedding ringsJewelry polishingInlaying precious stones
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsTranslatePress multilingual pluginForminator formsLiteSpeed Cache
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed credentials in HTML
  • Use of security nonce in forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
CookieYes
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional local jeweler site in Lithuania

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

70/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:rgjuvelyrika.lt
Issuer:ZeroSSL RSA Domain Secure Site CA
Valid Until:10/27/2025 (88 days)
SANs:rgjuvelyrika.lt, www.rgjuvelyrika.lt

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(810 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:45.84.206.212
AAAA Records:2a02:4780:9:962:0:18d3:65a4:6
Name Servers:
ns1.dns-parking.com
ns2.dns-parking.com
MX Records:
5: mx1.hostinger.lt
10: mx2.hostinger.lt
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.1 with plugins including Forminator for forms and TranslatePress for multilingual support. It uses jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is hosted likely by UAB Interneto vizija, as indicated by the registrar and DNS parking. Performance is moderate with some optimizations like LiteSpeed Cache and WebP images. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical debt or risks were identified from the content provided.
Analyze Another Website