Skip to main content

Is rgrupa.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - R GRUPA Reviews

rgrupa.lv favicon

Is rgrupa.lv Safe? Security Analysis for R GRUPA

Check if rgrupa.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyLatvialarge
Drupal 9Matomo AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelAdform tracking
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:30:48 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

R GRUPA is a leading forestry company based in Latvia, specializing in energy wood production, logistics, forest management, and exports. Established in 2002, it holds a strong market position in the Baltic region with a large operational scale and multiple international certifications such as FSC, SURE, SBP, and ISO standards. The company targets businesses and partners in forestry and energy sectors, offering a comprehensive range of products and services. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 9, leveraging modern analytics and marketing tools, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and anti-bot protections, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy business presence, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain trust verification.

Detected Technologies

Drupal 9Matomo AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelAdform tracking

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the energy and transportation sectors, focusing on forestry products and services. Its business model includes production, logistics, and export of energy wood and roundwood. The website indicates a large company size with a well-established market presence since 2002. The company emphasizes certifications and quality standards, enhancing its competitive advantage. Contact information and social media presence support customer engagement and transparency. The lack of WHOIS data is a limitation but does not detract from the visible business credibility. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

r*****@rgrupa.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3718070****
+3716727****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and anti-bot measures on forms, indicating a baseline security awareness. Tracking and analytics are implemented responsibly with cookie consent. However, no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. Security headers are not explicitly detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies and improving header configurations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

R GRUPA

Description:

R GRUPA is the largest energy wood production company in the Baltics, providing modern and diverse forestry services including energy wood production and trade, logistics, exports, property acquisition, forest cutting, and management.

Key Services:
Energy wood productionLogistics and transportForest and cutting managementWood export
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Drupal 9Matomo AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelAdform tracking
Frameworks:
Drupal CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of anti-bot form protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
MatomoGoogle Analytics (via GTM)Facebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Adform
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelMatomo
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

šŸ›”ļøSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

šŸ‘¤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

šŸ›”ļøNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

šŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

87/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:watchdog3@watchdog.kevlarr.io
Forensic Reports:itsupport@rgrupa.lv
MTA-STS Details

šŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

12 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

šŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.65.130
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: rgrupa-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:231ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

⚔Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

šŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Drupal 9 CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools including Matomo, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Adform. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. The site uses anti-bot mechanisms on forms to prevent spam. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website