Skip to main content

Is rias.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA RIAS Reviews

rias.lv favicon

Is rias.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA RIAS

Check if rias.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPress 6.8.2Elementor 3.30.0Yoast SEO 25.4jQuery 3.7.1FontAwesome 5.5.0+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:22:46 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SIA RIAS is a Latvian company established in 1994 specializing in equipment rental, material delivery, construction, and installation of biological treatment systems. The company targets both business and individual customers in the construction and transportation sectors within Latvia. Their website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and relevant business content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, which limits full trust assessment. Overall, the company presents as a legitimate small business with a professional online presence but could improve privacy and security compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Elementor 3.30.0Yoast SEO 25.4jQuery 3.7.1FontAwesome 5.5.0Swiper.jsContact Form 7

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the transportation and construction sectors, offering equipment rental (dump trucks, excavators), material delivery (sand, soil, gravel), and construction services (roads, ponds, earthworks). It maintains partnerships with several local companies, enhancing its market position. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on local clients. The website content and contact information are comprehensive, supporting credibility. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and limited social media presence suggest room for growth in digital marketing and compliance. The company appears stable with a consistent brand and a small-sized operation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@rias.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712632****
+3712925****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA RIAS

Registration Number:

40103112973

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, which are positive security measures. However, it lacks several important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits reduces the ability to verify domain legitimacy fully. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to enhance web security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA RIAS

Description:

SIA RIAS dibināts 1994. gadā. Uzņēmums nodarbojas ar tehnikas nomas, materiālu piegādes, būvniecības un bioloģisko attīrīšanas iekārtu uzstādīšanas pakalpojumiem. Pieredzējuši šoferi, tehnikas operatori un būvinženieri nodrošina augstu pakalpojuma kvalitāti.

Key Services:
Pašizgāzēju nomaEkskavatoru nomaMateriālu piegāde (smilts, melnzeme, šķembas, oļi, grunts)Būvniecība (ielas, laukumi, grāvji, dīķi)Bioloģiskās attīrīšanas iekārtu uzstādīšana
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Elementor 3.30.0Yoast SEO 25.4jQuery 3.7.1FontAwesome 5.5.0Swiper.jsContact Form 7
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook SDKGoogle reCAPTCHA
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.65.130
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx2.sigmanet.lv
10: mx.sigmanet.lv
SOA:Serial: 1732788401, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:398ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported CMS platform. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and FontAwesome for UI elements, and Swiper.js for image carousels. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms. Performance appears moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy compliance features.
Analyze Another Website