Is riga-tour.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Riga Tour
Check if riga-tour.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Riga Tour operates as a local sightseeing tour provider in Riga, offering city sightseeing services primarily targeting tourists and visitors. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce integration, utilizing the Astra theme and several plugins for enhanced functionality such as contact forms and payment processing. The technical infrastructure is standard for small tourism businesses, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and Google site verification present, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small tourism business but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security transparency.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business is positioned as a small local tourism operator specializing in city sightseeing tours in Riga. Its business model revolves around direct service provision to tourists, likely generating revenue through ticket sales or bookings via the website. The site targets international visitors, indicated by multilingual hreflang tags. There is no evidence of large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries. The company leverages WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and Stripe for payments, indicating a direct-to-consumer sales approach. Growth potential may be limited by the small scale and lack of extensive digital marketing or analytics tools. The absence of detailed contact or corporate information limits deeper business intelligence insights.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (2)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The site does not display privacy or cookie policies, which may lead to compliance issues with GDPR or other regulations. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and incident response contacts.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Riga Tour
City Sightseeing Riga
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Google site verification present
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a WordPress-based tourism site focused on Riga sightseeing tours.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, banking, health, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 31 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings