Skip to main content

Is rigacasting.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Riga Casting Reviews

R

Is rigacasting.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Riga Casting

Check if rigacasting.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
ReadymagGoogle Fonts (Roboto)Custom Fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:34:28 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Riga Casting is a small service-oriented business focused on casting services, likely in the creative or talent industry. The website is built on the Readymag platform and features minimal content, primarily contact information and social media links. The technical infrastructure is modern with use of Google Fonts and custom fonts, but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with no detected security headers and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which presents compliance risks. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting trust analysis. Overall, the website is functional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and content richness to enhance credibility and user trust.

Detected Technologies

ReadymagGoogle Fonts (Roboto)Custom Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business appears to target clients seeking casting services, possibly models or actors, with a straightforward service model. The presence on Facebook and Instagram suggests a focus on social media marketing. The lack of detailed business information and policies indicates a small or early-stage operation. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The business model is service-based with direct contact via email. Growth potential may be limited by minimal online presence and lack of comprehensive digital marketing or compliance frameworks.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@rigacasting.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low to moderate security maturity level. Absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options increases risk exposure. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The use of HTTPS is assumed but not confirmed from the data. Tracking pixels from Facebook, Google, and TikTok are present, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Riga Casting

Description:

Riga Casting appears to be a casting agency or service, likely related to talent or model casting based on the name and contact email. The website content is minimal but includes contact information and social media links.

Key Services:
casting services
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReadymagGoogle Fonts (Roboto)Custom Fonts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelTikTok Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel (fb:app_id)Google Analytics (UA-110571495-2, G-4MHCHDVPXV)Google Tag Manager (GTM-NPR9HT7)
Marketing Tools:
TikTok Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built on Readymag platform with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "nosniff, nosniff"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 87 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:54.194.41.141
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
50: mx.sigmanet.lv
100: mx2.sigmanet.lv
SOA:Serial: 1701854660, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:147ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Readymag platform, leveraging Google Fonts and custom fonts for typography. The site uses multiple JavaScript modules and tracking pixels for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization rated good. SEO optimization is poor due to minimal meta tags and lack of structured data. Accessibility features are basic. The site lacks advanced frameworks or CMS beyond Readymag. Hosting is via Readymag's CDN infrastructure. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist in SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website