
Is rigasjurists.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA RĪGAS JURISTS
Check if rigasjurists.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
SIA RĪGAS JURISTS is a Latvian legal and translation services provider specializing in professional legal consultations, document preparation, and certified translations with notary attestations. The company targets clients locally in Riga and across Latvia, as well as international clients requiring legal and translation support. The website presents a professional image with clear service offerings and contact information, positioning the company as a trusted small business in its sector. Technically, the website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience, although some improvements in accessibility and SEO could be made. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no security headers were detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating room for compliance improvements. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and functional, but lacks some advanced security and privacy features.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company operates in the legal and translation services sector, offering notarized translations, document apostille and legalization, and legal consultations. Its business model focuses on service delivery to individuals and businesses requiring legal and translation assistance. The website content and social media presence suggest a well-established local presence with international cooperation capabilities. The company emphasizes quality and Latvian cultural values, aiming to maintain trust and professionalism. Revenue streams likely derive from service fees for legal and translation work. The absence of detailed WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy assessment, but the business information and contact details support credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (2)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS usage is indicated by the canonical URL, but no explicit security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options) were detected in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The use of Google Analytics and Google Ads introduces tracking but is standard practice. Recommendations include implementing security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies, and ensuring secure form handling to enhance security and compliance.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
SIA RĪGAS JURISTS
SIA RĪGAS JURISTS is a legal and translation services provider offering professional legal consultations, document preparation, and specialized translation services with notarized certifications. The company targets clients in Riga and throughout Latvia, providing comprehensive legal support and international cooperation facilitation.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL (https://rigasjurists.lv)
- No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 69 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings