Skip to main content

Is rigopeter.sk a Scam? Security Check Results - Peter Rigo Photography Reviews

rigopeter.sk favicon

Is rigopeter.sk Safe? Security Analysis for Peter Rigo Photography

Check if rigopeter.sk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherSlovakiasmall
WordPress 5.1.1PHPjQuery 1.12.4Google FontsSlider Revolution+5 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 4:00:30 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Peter Rigo Photography is a professional wedding photography business based in Slovakia, offering specialized services including wedding day photography, portraits on different days, and photo editing. The website presents a well-structured and visually appealing portfolio targeting couples seeking high-quality wedding photography. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and several plugins, leveraging modern web technologies and third-party marketing and analytics tools. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks some important security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version, which could pose risks. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but could improve in security and compliance aspects.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 5.1.1PHPjQuery 1.12.4Google FontsSlider RevolutionElementorPiotnet Addons for Elementor ProUltimate ElementorSticky Header Effects for ElementorWP Cookie Allow

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the wedding photography sector, targeting couples primarily in Slovakia but with international reach. Its business model is service-based, focusing on personalized photography experiences. The website supports the business by showcasing portfolios, blogs, and advice sections, enhancing customer engagement. The presence of an English partner domain indicates an effort to reach a broader audience. The company appears small but professional, with consistent branding and trust signals such as Google site verification and social media integration. No direct contact details are visible, which may limit immediate customer interaction.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

S*****@peterrigo.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent, which are positive security practices. However, it lacks several critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The use of an older jQuery version (1.12.4) may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not properly patched. No signs of exposed sensitive data or insecure forms were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not present, indicating limited transparency in security governance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Peter Rigo Photography

Description:

Pozrite si tie najkrajšie fotky svadobného fotografa Petra Riga. Mojou misiou je pretaviť emóciu krásneho zážitku do nádhernej fotografie.

Key Services:
Wedding photographyWedding portraits on different daysPhoto editing and retouching
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 5.1.1PHPjQuery 1.12.4Google FontsSlider RevolutionElementorPiotnet Addons for Elementor ProUltimate ElementorSticky Header Effects for ElementorWP Cookie Allow
Frameworks:
WordPressElementor
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle AdsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Ads (AW-985351900)Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional wedding photography service based in Slovakia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.m1.websupport.sk ?all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:?all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:37.9.175.131
Name Servers:
ns1.websupport.skDNS only
ns2.websupport.skDNS only
ns3.websupport.skDNS only
MX Records:
10: mailin1.rigopeter.sk
100: mailin2.rigopeter.sk
SOA:Serial: 1694009624, TTL: 2560s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:110ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.m1.websupport.sk ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 5.1.1 with Elementor and several advanced plugins like Slider Revolution and Piotnet Addons, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. The site uses Google Fonts and asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts, which supports performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of multiple plugins and large image assets. Technical debt is moderate due to outdated jQuery and missing security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve security configurations.
Analyze Another Website