Skip to main content

Is risiko-dialog.ch a Scam? Security Check Results - Stiftung Risiko-Dialog Reviews

risiko-dialog.ch favicon

Is risiko-dialog.ch Safe? Security Analysis for Stiftung Risiko-Dialog

https://risiko-dialog.ch

Check if risiko-dialog.ch is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergySwitzerlandsmall
WordPressjQueryMatomo Analyticsimgix (image optimization)
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:13:06 AM
74
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Stiftung Risiko-Dialog is a Swiss non-profit foundation focused on fostering societal resilience and risk competence through dialogue with stakeholders and the public. The foundation operates primarily in the energy and societal sectors, addressing challenges related to digitalization, climate, and risk management. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting a broad audience including civil society and stakeholders interested in risk and resilience topics. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics and imgix for image optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, providing a good user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, supporting the foundation's mission effectively.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryMatomo Analyticsimgix (image optimization)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The foundation holds a niche position in the Swiss non-profit sector, focusing on risk dialogue and societal resilience. Its business model revolves around research, stakeholder engagement, and public communication rather than commercial revenue. The website supports multilingual access, indicating an inclusive approach. The presence of social media channels and regular news updates suggests active engagement and transparency. No commercial advertising or affiliate programs are detected, consistent with a non-profit profile. The foundation's partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly listed, indicating a standalone operation. The organization's credibility is supported by clear contact information and professional content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@risiko-dialog.ch

Phone Numbers (1)

+4158255****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and use of privacy-respecting analytics (Matomo). No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Stiftung Risiko-Dialog

Description:

Die Stiftung Risiko-Dialog ist ein unabhängiger Think & Do Tank, der den Dialog mit Stakeholdern und der Bevölkerung führt, um den Umgang mit gesellschaftlichen, technologischen und ökologischen Risiken zu fördern und tragfähige Lösungen für die Zukunft zu gestalten.

Key Services:
Dialogführung mit Stakeholdern und BevölkerungFörderung von Risikokompetenz und ResilienzkulturProjekte in den Themenfeldern Digitalisierung, Klima & Energie, Risiko & Resilienz
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryMatomo Analyticsimgix (image optimization)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.goeast.ch include:servers.mcsv.net -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:re+dmaikn444av@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.risiko-dialog.ch
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid Until:4/18/2026 (196 days)
SANs:*.risiko-dialog.ch

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:18.196.126.78
AAAA Records:2a05:d014:5d5:ad00:1bb2:1ef1:a62f:4799
Name Servers:
homer.goeast.chDNS only
maggie.goeast.chDNS only
MX Records:
0: risikodialog-ch01e.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024072402, TTL: 30s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:70ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.goeast.ch include:servers.mcsv.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery and uses Matomo for analytics, indicating a preference for privacy-conscious tools. Images are optimized via imgix, improving load times and performance. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly, with good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. The HTML is valid and well-structured, supporting accessibility at a basic level. Hosting details are not explicit but the use of external Matomo server suggests third-party analytics hosting. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by adding caching and security headers. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about risiko-dialog.ch

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website