Skip to main content

Is rivercabin.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - River Cabin Reviews

rivercabin.lv favicon

Is rivercabin.lv Safe? Security Analysis for River Cabin

Check if rivercabin.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
WordPressElementorjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:00:56 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

River Cabin is a small hospitality business based in Latvia offering a riverside cabin experience focused on comfort and relaxation. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and includes booking functionality, special offers, and a 360° virtual tour. The site is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is good with a clear privacy policy and GDPR cookie banner. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the website content and contact information suggest a legitimate small business. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and user-friendly experience for leisure travelers seeking a nature retreat.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelGTranslate

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets leisure travelers interested in nature and riverside accommodation. It operates a direct booking model with special offers to attract customers. The company maintains a social media presence on Instagram and Facebook to engage with its audience. The website content is consistent and professional, supporting a niche market position in Latvian hospitality. The use of modern web technologies and compliance with GDPR indicate a digitally mature operation. However, the lack of detailed company registration or WHOIS data suggests a small or privately held entity without extensive public corporate disclosures.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712542****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting basic security and privacy awareness. However, it lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing additional security best practices and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve trust and resilience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

River Cabin

Description:

River Cabin is a hospitality business offering a carefully designed and cherished riverside cabin for relaxation and comfort. It provides a wide range of activities to make the stay memorable, located by the river, forest, and bird sounds to help guests disconnect from daily worries.

Key Services:
AccommodationBooking systemSpecial offers360° virtual tours
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelGTranslate
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.224 +ip4:85.31.97.28 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.224
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: rivercabin.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025071000, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:135ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.224 +ip4:85.31.97.28 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and uses jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. It supports multiple languages via GTranslate. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized. The HTML is valid and includes meta tags for SEO. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site lacks advanced security headers and detailed technical documentation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website