Skip to main content

Is rixoil.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - RIXOIL Reviews

rixoil.eu favicon

Is rixoil.eu Safe? Security Analysis for RIXOIL

Check if rixoil.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyLatviasmall
jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle Maps APIWordPress
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:18:30 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

RIXOIL is a privately owned company specializing in the supply chain, logistics, consulting, financial services, and trading of oil and chemical products. The company operates strategically located storage facilities and focuses on efficient and reliable delivery of petroleum products including bitumen, paraffins, alkylbenzenes, and liquefied gases. Their market position is that of a reliable and innovative partner with strong logistics networks and financial institution relations, aiming for a leading global presence in the energy sector. The website is built on WordPress with common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, providing a professional and responsive user experience. However, the site lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and no social media or incident response contacts are provided. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and some API key misconfigurations. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trust but is common for private companies. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in security and compliance transparency.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle Maps APIWordPress

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

RIXOIL targets global industries requiring oil and chemical products, offering a diversified product portfolio and services including consulting, supply chain management, and trading. Their business model is B2B focused, leveraging a strong logistics network and financial partnerships to maintain competitive advantages. The company is positioned as a small but growing player in the energy and transportation sectors, with a clear focus on quality service and market responsiveness. The absence of social media presence and limited online marketing tools suggests a traditional business approach. The company provides VAT information and a physical office address in Latvia, supporting business credibility. Growth indicators and partnerships are implied but not explicitly detailed on the website.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@rixoil.eu

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712311****
+3712311****

Company Registration

VAT Number:

LV40103846923

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The Google Maps API key is exposed without visible restrictions, posing a risk of misuse. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the company's readiness to handle security incidents publicly. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvements in headers, policy transparency, and incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

RIXOIL

Description:

RIXOIL is an independent, privately owned company specializing in supply chain, logistics, consulting, financial services, and trading of oil and chemical products. They operate strategically located storage facilities and focus on efficient, reliable delivery and international trade of petroleum products including bitumen, paraffins, alkylbenzenes, technical sulfurs, liquefied gases, and aromatic hydrocarbons.

Key Services:
Consulting & Financial ServicesSupply Chain & LogisticsTrading
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle Maps APIWordPress
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based corporate site for an oil and chemical trading company.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.243.93.68 a mx -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.32.1, 104.21.64.1, 104.21.48.1, 104.21.96.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.112.1, 104.21.80.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001
Name Servers:
demi.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
hugh.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
50: webmail.rixoil.eu
SOA:Serial: 2378654346, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:410ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.243.93.68 a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 4.7.29, using jQuery 1.12.4, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and Google Maps API. The tech stack is somewhat outdated, with older versions of WordPress and jQuery that may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. The site is moderately performant with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The Google Maps integration is functional but shows an API key warning, indicating a need for better API key management. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website