Skip to main content

Is rizhaolongbai.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 日照惠泽农林科技有限公司 Reviews

Is rizhaolongbai.com Safe? Security Analysis for 日照惠泽农林科技有限公司

Check if rizhaolongbai.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherChinamedium
jQuerybxSliderJavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 11:06:49 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

日照惠泽农林科技有限公司是一家专注于小龙柏及多种园林绿化苗木种植与销售的中型企业,主要服务于园林绿化行业客户和苗木采购商。网站内容丰富,涵盖产品展示、公司简介及行业资讯,体现出一定的市场定位和业务深度。技术上,网站采用了jQuery和bxSlider等常见前端技术,支持HTTPS访问,但缺乏高级安全配置和隐私合规措施。安全方面,网站未检测到明显的安全威胁,但缺少关键安全头和隐私政策,存在合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失,可能影响域名信任度。整体风险中等,建议加强安全和合规建设以提升业务信誉。

Detected Technologies

jQuerybxSliderJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该公司在园林绿化苗木领域拥有较为专业的产品线和服务,涵盖小龙柏、龙柏苗、嫁接苗等多种苗木,面向区域市场。网站通过丰富的产品和新闻内容支持业务推广,且联系方式明确,有助于客户沟通。外链较多,部分为非相关站点,可能为SEO目的。缺乏社交媒体和现代营销工具,显示数字营销尚处于基础阶段。WHOIS信息缺失可能影响潜在客户信任,建议完善域名注册信息和公开透明度。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

1*****@qq.com

Phone Numbers (1)

189*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站启用了HTTPS,保障了数据传输安全,但未配置常见安全头如CSP、HSTS等,增加了潜在风险。表单使用GET方法且无CSRF防护,存在安全隐患。缺少隐私政策和Cookie同意机制,可能不符合GDPR等隐私法规。无安全事件响应联系方式,安全管理和合规性不足。建议尽快补充安全头,改进表单安全,完善隐私合规文档,并建立安全事件响应流程。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

部署并配置关键安全HTTP头(CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options等)以提升防护能力。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

日照惠泽农林科技有限公司

Description:

日照惠泽农林科技有限公司是专业从事小龙柏,龙柏苗,龙柏床苗,龙柏树,龙柏球,龙柏工程苗种植与销售的的大型园林绿化苗木公司。主要经营小龙柏,龙柏苗,龙柏床苗,嫁接小龙柏,龙柏树,龙柏球,龙柏工程苗等等,欢迎前来合作。

Key Services:
小龙柏种植与销售龙柏苗销售嫁接小龙柏龙柏床苗龙柏树及龙柏球销售园林绿化工程苗木供应
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuerybxSliderJavaScriptCSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS used
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Forms use GET method for search

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
51.la
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
51.la
Marketing Tools:
Baidu linksubmit
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

59/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

HSTS Missing includeSubDomains

LOW

HSTS header does not include subdomains

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

17 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(187 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:121.4.90.224
Name Servers:
dns10.hichina.com
dns9.hichina.com
SOA:Serial: 2025032613, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:348ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用传统的HTML+CSS+JavaScript技术栈,使用jQuery和bxSlider实现交互和轮播效果。页面结构清晰,导航合理,但移动端优化仅为基础水平。无使用主流CMS或现代前端框架,技术较为传统。性能表现中等,未见明显加载瓶颈。缺少结构化数据和Open Graph标签,SEO优化空间较大。建议引入现代前端技术和响应式设计,提升用户体验和搜索引擎表现。
Analyze Another Website