Skip to main content

Is roadmaster.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Road Master Reviews

roadmaster.lv favicon

Is roadmaster.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Road Master

Check if roadmaster.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
FramerJavaScript
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:54:13 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Road Master is a small Latvian company specializing in construction services, including the delivery of sand, gravel, and other materials, as well as construction waste recycling. The website presents a clear business focus targeting customers in Gulbene and Riga, Latvia. The company appears to operate locally with a straightforward service offering. Technically, the website is built using Framer, a modern design tool, and includes JavaScript for interactive elements. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, the website lacks critical privacy and security policies, and no WHOIS data was available to verify domain registration details due to query limits. Security posture is basic, with no detected security headers or advanced configurations, and no HTTPS status was confirmed from the data provided. Overall, the site is safe and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Detected Technologies

FramerJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the transportation and construction sectors, providing essential materials and waste recycling services. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on local markets in Latvia. The website content suggests a small-sized enterprise with no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of detailed business registration or certification information limits deeper business intelligence insights. The company’s market position appears to be local and niche, serving construction companies and individuals requiring material delivery and recycling services. There is no evidence of extensive marketing or advertising efforts, indicating a possibly modest growth strategy.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@roadmaster.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which raises compliance concerns, especially under GDPR regulations applicable in Latvia. The absence of contact information for incident response or security-related inquiries further limits the site's security readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices suggests potential risks. The company should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts to improve its security posture and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration to secure all website traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Road Master

Description:

Piedāvājam būvniecības pakalpojumus, smilts piegāde, šķembu un citu materiālu iegāde, būvniecības atkritumu pārstrādi

Key Services:
Construction servicesSand deliveryGravel and other material supplyConstruction waste recycling
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerJavaScript
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:35.71.142.77, 52.223.52.2
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: roadmaster-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024082812, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:136ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design platform, and includes JavaScript for interactive features. The site loads external resources from framerusercontent.com and cdn.voiceflow.com. The HTML structure is well-formed and includes meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). However, no CMS or hosting provider information was identified. Performance appears moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta descriptions and canonical links. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking services, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. The site would benefit from enhanced technical security measures and privacy compliance implementations.
Analyze Another Website