Skip to main content

Is robfitz.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Robfitz in progress Reviews

robfitz.com favicon

Is robfitz.com Safe? Security Analysis for Robfitz in progress

Check if robfitz.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Ruby on RailsReactTailwind CSSStripeGoogle Tag Manager+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:37:39 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Robfitz in progress is a niche community platform focused on supporting writers and nonfiction authors through idea sharing, writing feedback, and community discussions. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and consistent branding, targeting authors and community members interested in writing and customer development. Technically, the site uses modern technologies including Ruby on Rails, React, Tailwind CSS, and integrates third-party services like Stripe and Google Tag Manager. The platform is hosted on Circle.so, a community platform provider. Security posture is good with HTTPS, CSRF protection, and nonce usage, but lacks visible security policies and incident response information. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, and no contact information is provided, which impacts business credibility. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness despite the professional website presence. Overall, the site is safe, well-structured, and serves its community purpose effectively but should improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

Ruby on RailsReactTailwind CSSStripeGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook SDKCircle.so platform

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as a small community platform serving writers and nonfiction authors, focusing on idea development and customer development discussions. It leverages a community-driven business model with content contributions primarily from Rob Fitzpatrick. The platform integrates external resources and links to related author communities and educational content. The market position is niche with a focus on quality writing support rather than mass engagement. The absence of clear business contact information and privacy policies suggests an informal or early-stage operation. The use of Circle.so indicates reliance on third-party community infrastructure. Growth potential depends on community engagement and content quality.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced, CSRF tokens, and nonce usage in scripts. However, it lacks visible security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No security certifications or frameworks are mentioned. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site should enhance transparency by publishing security and privacy documentation and establishing incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Robfitz in progress

Description:

Robfitz in progress community home page

Key Services:
Community discussionsIdea sharingWriting feedbackLinks to external resources related to writing and nonfiction authorship
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Ruby on RailsReactTailwind CSSStripeGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook SDKCircle.so platform
Frameworks:
Ruby on RailsReact
Platforms:
Circle.so community platform
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS
  • CSRF tokens present
  • Nonce used in scripts
  • No visible sensitive data exposure

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerPingdom
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Pingdom
Marketing Tools:
Facebook SDKStripe
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a community platform focused on writing and author support.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 87 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.robfitz.com
Issuer:WR1
Valid Until:12/3/2025 (87 days)
SANs:www.robfitz.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(34 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.131.150.69
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsimple.com
ns2.dnsimple-edge.net
ns3.dnsimple.com
ns4.dnsimple-edge.org
MX Records:
1: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com
5: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com
10: ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com
5: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com
10: ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com
SOA:Serial: 2013022164, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:174ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Ruby on Rails and React, styled with Tailwind CSS, and hosted on the Circle.so platform. It integrates payment processing via Stripe and uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses CSRF tokens and script nonces for security. There is room for improvement in accessibility and explicit security header implementation. The technical infrastructure supports a community-driven content model effectively.
Analyze Another Website