Skip to main content

Is rola-ip.co a Scam? Security Check Results - Rola-IP Reviews

rola-ip.co favicon

Is rola-ip.co Safe? Security Analysis for Rola-IP

Check if rola-ip.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
jQuery 3.6.0SweetAlert2LiveChat WidgetOwl Carousel
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 12:49:57 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Rola-IP is a professional global proxy service provider established in 2020, offering a wide range of proxy solutions including residential, datacenter, mobile, and IPv6 proxies. The company targets businesses requiring reliable data collection, ad verification, SEO monitoring, and market research services, positioning itself as a major player with extensive IP pools and global coverage. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity with modern JavaScript libraries, live chat support, and a professional design. However, it lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, and no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. The domain is privacy-protected but registered with a reputable registrar and has an appropriate age for the business type. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in DNSSEC, security headers, and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.6.0SweetAlert2LiveChat WidgetOwl Carousel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Rola-IP operates in the technology sector with a focus on proxy services supporting big data and enterprise clients, including Fortune 500 companies. Its business model is subscription and pay-per-GB based, serving a global audience with over 105 million IPs and presence in 210+ countries. The company maintains partnerships with multiple related service providers and platforms, enhancing its ecosystem. The website content and testimonials indicate a trustworthy service with 24/7 support and stable infrastructure. Growth indicators include a large IP pool and multiple proxy types catering to diverse customer needs.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@rola-ip.co

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections enabled, but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers, which are important for preventing DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The contact information is available but no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Rola-IP

Description:

Rola-IP is a professional global IP proxy provider offering HTTP/HTTPS/Socks5 Proxy, Rotating Proxy, Static Proxy, Residential IP, data center IP, Sneaker proxy, IPv6 Proxy with support for Android/IOS/Windows/Mac access, unlimited concurrency, and fast stable proxy services.

Key Services:
Residential ProxyDatacenter ProxyMobile ProxyIPv6 Proxy
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.6.0SweetAlert2LiveChat WidgetOwl Carousel
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
LiveChat
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple service descriptions.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

63 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(192 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:47.239.56.104
Name Servers:
ns45.domaincontrol.com
ns46.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
10: inbound-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:122ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.6.0, SweetAlert2 for alerts, Owl Carousel for UI carousels, and LiveChat for customer support. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Hosting appears to be managed via GoDaddy with domaincontrol.com DNS servers. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers which could expose the site to certain attacks.
Analyze Another Website