Skip to main content

Is roselove.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 沈阳好花科技有限公司 Reviews

Is roselove.com Safe? Security Analysis for 沈阳好花科技有限公司

Check if roselove.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailChinamedium
jQuerySlick SliderCustom JavaScriptCSS3
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 6:47:57 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Roselove.com is a Chinese e-commerce platform specializing in high-end fresh flower online ordering and delivery services. The company, identified as Shenyang Haohua Technology Co., Ltd., offers a variety of floral products including romantic, friendship, business, wedding flowers, and preserved flowers. The website targets general consumers in China seeking timely and customized floral gifts, with a market position as a mid-tier specialized flower retailer. The platform supports 24-hour ordering with delivery as fast as within 1-3 hours, emphasizing freshness and romantic symbolism. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components, with custom JavaScript and CSS. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and no advanced frameworks are detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. Forms do not show anti-CSRF tokens, and no incident response or security policies are published. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern, though the presence of ICP and public security备案 numbers supports legitimacy within China. Overall, the website is functional and professional with good content quality and business credibility. Security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. The domain registration opacity reduces trust slightly but does not negate the apparent legitimate business operations. Strategic improvements in security and privacy transparency are recommended.

Detected Technologies

jQuerySlick SliderCustom JavaScriptCSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Roselove operates in the retail sector focusing on online flower sales and delivery in China. Its competitive advantage lies in rapid delivery, product variety, and customization options. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with additional services like business and wedding floral arrangements. Revenue streams likely include product sales and possibly premium delivery fees. Target customers are individuals seeking gifts and event organizers. The company maintains partnerships with related service sites and flower shops, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include a broad product catalog and active customer service channels. The company appears medium-sized with consistent branding and moderate market presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

400*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, but the lack of security headers and anti-CSRF protections exposes the site to common web vulnerabilities. No published security or incident response policies limit transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices are minimal with no visible GDPR compliance or cookie consent. The absence of analytics reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Incident response readiness is unknown due to lack of published contacts. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with room for significant improvement to meet modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

沈阳好花科技有限公司

Description:

roselove官网专注高端鲜花网上预订速递服务,运用每一朵独特的鲜花为您打造浪漫的真爱信物,以“见证真爱”为主张,诠释真爱无距离,支持24小时网上订花送花,快至1小时免费送花上门,个性鲜花礼品定制。

Key Services:
Online fresh flower ordering and deliveryCustomized flower gifts24-hour delivery serviceBusiness and wedding floral arrangements
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuerySlick SliderCustom JavaScriptCSS3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies not verifiable from data

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(572 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:61.147.81.224
Name Servers:
f1g1ns1.dnspod.net
f1g1ns2.dnspod.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Slick Slider for interactive elements. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and user experience. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially for mobile devices. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, indicating a custom or legacy build. Hosting details are not disclosed. The lack of advanced accessibility features and security headers suggests technical debt and modernization opportunities. Enhancing these areas would reduce technical risks and improve operational resilience.
Analyze Another Website