Is rpo.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Rīgas pasažieru osta
Check if rpo.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Rīgas pasažieru osta operates as a key passenger port in Riga, Latvia, servicing approximately one million visitors annually arriving via cruise ships, ferries, and yachts. The organization also pursues real estate development and offers leisure opportunities near Riga's historic and active city center. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization, supporting Latvian and English languages. Technically, the site uses jQuery and Slick Slider libraries, with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies. No contact emails or phone numbers are directly visible in the provided HTML content, which limits direct communication channels. Overall, the site presents a moderate security posture with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company positions itself as an essential transportation hub and real estate developer in Riga, targeting tourists, business clients, and investors. Its business model combines port operations with property development and leisure services, aiming to enhance the visitor experience and attract investments. The website content and structure reflect a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a focus on local and international audiences. Absence of detailed business registration or certification information on the site suggests potential areas for transparency enhancement. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are linked from the site.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk from injection attacks, but also indicating limited interactive functionality. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations, which is a significant compliance gap. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Rīgas pasažieru osta
Rīgas pasažieru osta is a passenger port in Riga servicing approximately 1 million guests annually arriving by cruise ships, ferries, yachts, and other vessels excluding cargo ships. It also undertakes significant real estate development plans and offers leisure opportunities near Riga's old town and active city center.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Soon
HIGHSSL certificate expires in 24 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings