Skip to main content

Is rspo.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) Reviews

rspo.org favicon

Is rspo.org Safe? Security Analysis for Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)

Check if rspo.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Stateslarge
WordPressjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelSlick Carousel+3 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 8:32:36 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) is a well-established global partnership focused on promoting sustainable palm oil production and sourcing through certification and standards development. Founded in 2004, RSPO serves a diverse audience including individuals, smallholders, organizations, and members committed to sustainability in the palm oil sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, multi-language support, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and tracking tools, hosted behind Cloudflare, and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though improvements such as DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent banners. Overall, RSPO's website demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness, supporting its role as a leading authority in sustainable palm oil.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelSlick CarouselChart.jsCookiefirst Consent ManagementGTranslate

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

RSPO occupies a leading market position as a non-profit multi-stakeholder organization setting global standards for sustainable palm oil. Its business model revolves around certification, member engagement, and impact reporting. The organization targets a broad spectrum of stakeholders from individual consumers to large organizations and smallholders. The presence of partner portals and a comprehensive resource library indicates a robust ecosystem supporting growth and influence. The website's content and social media integration reflect active engagement and transparency, supporting RSPO's credibility and growth potential in the sustainability sector.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could be improved to increase transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional best practices and disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)

Description:

RSPO is a global partnership aiming to make palm oil sustainable by setting environmental and social standards for certified sustainable palm oil production and sourcing.

Key Services:
Certification standards developmentMember resources and supportImpact reportingPublic consultations and stakeholder engagement
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelSlick CarouselChart.jsCookiefirst Consent ManagementGTranslate
Frameworks:
Yoast SEO
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook PixelTwitter Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelTwitter Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Cookiefirst Consent Management
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well maintained

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:170.249.253.247 ip4:67.222.3.86 ip4:216.9.240.0/20 ip4:64.18.0.0/20 ip4:202.75.157.234 ip4:202.188.222.74 ip4:172.16.254.1 ip4:103.151.192.0/23 ip4:185.12.80.0/22 ip4:188.172.128.0/20 ip4:192.161.144.0/20 ip4:216.198.0.0/18 include:_spf.goog le.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:et._spf.pardot.com include:spf.sendinblue.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:242596988.spf06.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m
Forensic Reports:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:rspo.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/5/2025 (59 days)
SANs:rspo.org, *.rspo.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(84 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.27.114, 172.67.169.37
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:1b72, 2606:4700:3037::ac43:a925
Name Servers:
kolton.ns.cloudflare.com
ursula.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382435730, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:69ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:170.249.253.247 ip4:67.222.3.86 ip4:216.9.240.0/20 ip4:64.18.0.0/20 ip4:202.75.157.234 ip4:202.188.222.74 ip4:172.16.254.1 ip4:103.151.192.0/23 ip4:185.12.80.0/22 ip4:188.172.128.0/20 ip4:192.161.144.0/20 ip4:216.198.0.0/18 include:_spf.goog le.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:et._spf.pardot.com include:spf.sendinblue.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:242596988.spf06.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Chart.js, Slick Carousel, and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare providing DNS and CDN services. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load speed by optimizing scripts and images. The use of multiple external scripts and tracking services is balanced with a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and supports the organization's digital goals effectively.
Analyze Another Website