Skip to main content

Is ruanmei.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 青岛软媒网络科技有限公司 Reviews

Is ruanmei.com Safe? Security Analysis for 青岛软媒网络科技有限公司

Check if ruanmei.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinamedium
Bootstrap 3.3.4FontAwesome 4.4.0Animate.css 3.1.0jQuery 2.1.4WOW.js+1 more
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 2:41:31 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

青岛软媒网络科技有限公司是一家成立于2006年的中国科技公司,专注于软件开发、互联网媒体和电商导购平台运营。公司旗下拥有多个成熟产品,包括软媒魔方软件工具包、IT之家科技媒体平台以及辣品电商导购平台,面向中国及中文互联网用户提供服务。网站内容丰富,设计专业,导航清晰,适合目标用户群体访问。技术栈基于Bootstrap、jQuery和动画库,整体性能适中,移动端优化良好。安全方面,网站未检测到安全头信息,WHOIS信息缺失降低了域名信任度,且缺少隐私和Cookie政策,存在合规风险。建议加强安全配置,完善隐私合规文档,并核实域名注册信息以提升整体信任度。

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 3.3.4FontAwesome 4.4.0Animate.css 3.1.0jQuery 2.1.4WOW.jsBaidu Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

软媒在中国科技和互联网媒体领域占有稳固地位,拥有多条产品线覆盖软件工具、媒体内容和电商导购,形成多元化业务模式。公司通过旗下平台吸引大量用户,结合广告、公关及电商合作,构建了较为完善的商业生态。其市场定位为中大型科技企业,目标客户为关注科技新闻、软件优化及电商优惠的广大中文用户。公司公开联系方式和备案信息,显示一定的正规运营水平。缺乏公开的安全和隐私政策是其潜在的合规短板。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (3)

p*****@ruanmei.com
b*****@ruanmei.com
f*****@ruanmei.com

Phone Numbers (3)

186*******
186*******
053*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

当前网站安全成熟度中等,未发现明显漏洞或敏感信息泄露,但缺少关键安全头和隐私合规文档,存在潜在风险。WHOIS信息缺失可能影响域名信誉,建议加强域名管理透明度。无安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道,降低了安全事件处理能力。整体安全文化和合规意识需提升以满足现代法规要求。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

部署并配置安全HTTP头(如Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, HSTS)以提升防护能力。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

青岛软媒网络科技有限公司

Description:

软媒是一家位于中国青岛的科技公司,主营软件和互联网媒体平台业务。公司成立于2006年,旗下拥有多个产品和平台,包括IT之家、魔方、辣品电商导购平台等,致力于为用户提供优质的软件工具和互联网内容服务。

Key Services:
软件工具包(软媒魔方)科技媒体平台(IT之家)电商导购平台(辣品/最会买)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 3.3.4FontAwesome 4.4.0Animate.css 3.1.0jQuery 2.1.4WOW.jsBaidu Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.ruanmei.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/7/2025 (64 days)
SANs:www.ruanmei.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Slow DNS Resolution

LOW

DNS resolution took 1066ms (>1000ms)

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
19 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(258 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:180.97.198.35, 182.240.161.35, 183.131.185.35, 175.12.90.35, 218.94.232.35, 219.151.25.35, 218.94.231.35, 183.60.227.35, 150.138.253.35, 171.107.86.35
Name Servers:
f1g1ns1.dnspod.net
f1g1ns2.dnspod.net
MX Records:
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
10: mxbiz2.qq.com
SOA:Serial: 1734070238, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:1066ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用较为传统的前端技术栈,包括Bootstrap 3.3.4和jQuery 2.1.4,配合动画库和百度统计实现动态效果和用户行为分析。页面结构清晰,响应式设计良好,适配移动设备。未检测到现代前端框架或CMS,可能存在技术更新空间。性能表现中等,依赖外部CDN资源。缺少安全头和隐私合规脚本,存在技术和合规改进空间。
Analyze Another Website