Skip to main content

Is rubikvc.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Rubik Reviews

rubikvc.com favicon

Is rubikvc.com Safe? Security Analysis for Rubik

Check if rubikvc.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WebflowjQuery
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:47:22 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Rubik is a venture capital firm focused on backing elite teams building the next era of the internet, with a particular emphasis on blockchain technology. The company positions itself globally with offices in New York and Hong Kong, targeting startups and entrepreneurs in the technology and blockchain sectors. The website presents a professional and modern design built on the Webflow platform, utilizing jQuery for scripting. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. The site lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, and no security headers were detected, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Contact information is minimal, limited to a single company email and a Twitter link, with no phone numbers or physical addresses provided. Overall, the website is functional and visually appealing but requires enhancements in security, compliance, and transparency to improve trustworthiness and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

WebflowjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Rubik operates as a specialized venture capital firm in the technology sector, focusing on blockchain innovation. Its business model revolves around investing in and supporting elite teams shaping the future internet landscape. The firm targets a global audience, with physical presence in major financial hubs. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting its market positioning. However, the lack of detailed company information, absence of regulatory compliance documents, and missing WHOIS data suggest potential risks or early-stage operation. The firm’s digital presence is limited in scope, with minimal analytics or marketing tools detected, indicating a low reliance on extensive digital marketing or tracking. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

t*****@rubikvc.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture of the website is basic. The site is accessible over HTTPS (assumed due to Webflow hosting), but no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected. There are no visible forms or input fields, reducing attack surface, but also no evidence of secure data handling practices. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security issues. Overall, the site demonstrates minimal security best practices and would benefit from implementing standard security headers, compliance documentation, and incident response mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS with proper SSL/TLS configuration and verify with security headers such as HSTS.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Rubik

Description:

Rubik is a venture capital firm that backs elite teams building the next era of the internet, with a focus on blockchain technology and a global perspective. They have offices in New York and Hong Kong.

Key Services:
Venture capital fundingPortfolio support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowjQuery
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1096-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(301 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-c2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-c3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-c4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 8, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS and includes jQuery 3.5.1 for scripting. It is hosted on Webflow's CDN infrastructure with assets served from cdn.prod.website-files.com and scripts from Cloudfront. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS with responsive design elements, providing good mobile optimization and user experience. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No analytics or tracking services are integrated, indicating minimal user tracking. Performance is moderate, typical for Webflow-hosted sites. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility attributes detected. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with improved SEO, accessibility, and analytics integration.
Analyze Another Website