Skip to main content

Is rure.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Rūre Reviews

rure.lv favicon

Is rure.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Rūre

Check if rure.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareLatviasmall
GatsbyReactGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:04:24 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Rūre is a Latvian healthcare organization specializing in palliative care, social care, physical rehabilitation, and medical equipment rental services. The website is designed primarily for Latvian-speaking patients and families seeking healthcare support. The company appears to be a small local provider with a focused service offering in the healthcare sector. Technically, the website is built using modern static site generation technology (Gatsby) and incorporates tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. The site performs well with good mobile optimization and user experience. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data, but lacks important security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

GatsbyReactGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the healthcare sector, providing essential palliative and rehabilitation services in Latvia. Its business model revolves around direct healthcare service delivery and medical equipment rentals. The website targets local patients and caregivers, positioning itself as a trusted regional healthcare provider. The use of modern web technologies and tracking tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and limited contact information may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The company’s market presence appears stable but limited to a regional scope.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms like security.txt. The presence of tracking pixels without clear privacy disclosures may raise compliance concerns under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Rūre

Description:

Rūre is a healthcare organization providing palliative care, social care center services, physical rehabilitation, medical services, and technical aid rentals. The website content is primarily in Latvian and targets local audiences seeking healthcare and rehabilitation services.

Key Services:
Mobile palliative care at homeSocial care centerPalliative care clinicPhysical rehabilitationMedical services and technical aid rental
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
GatsbyReactGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Frameworks:
Gatsby
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web16.garmtech.net include:relay.mailchannels.net include:_spf.google.com -all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:199.36.158.100
Name Servers:
ns1.garmtech.comDNS only
ns2.garmtech.comDNS only
ns3.garmtech.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
1: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
5: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
5: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
10: ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 2025052301, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:245ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web16.garmtech.net include:relay.mailchannels.net include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Gatsby, a modern React-based static site generator, which contributes to fast loading times and good performance. The use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel indicates integration with popular analytics and marketing platforms. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility basics. However, there is no evidence of a traditional CMS or dynamic backend. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site lacks some SEO and accessibility enhancements such as ARIA landmarks or detailed meta tags beyond basic viewport and charset. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and efficient but could benefit from additional SEO and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website