Skip to main content

Is rwa.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Castle Labs, Inc. dba RWA.xyz Reviews

rwa.xyz favicon

Is rwa.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Castle Labs, Inc. dba RWA.xyz

Check if rwa.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Inter, Archivo)HubSpot analytics and formsjQuery 3.5.1Typer.js+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:27:19 PM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

RWA.xyz, operated by Castle Labs, Inc., is a specialized data platform focused on tokenized real-world assets across public blockchains. It serves a sophisticated audience including institutions, regulators, investors, and asset issuers by providing comprehensive analytics, API access, and asset listing services. The platform is positioned as an industry-standard reference, trusted by major financial and media entities such as Moody's, Coinbase, Bloomberg, NASDAQ, and Forbes. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the site is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, HubSpot analytics and forms, and JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Typer.js. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility practices are well implemented, contributing to a robust digital presence. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure embedded forms. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and security.txt files for vulnerability disclosure are absent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. Contact information is transparent, though no dedicated security or incident response contacts are published. Overall, RWA.xyz demonstrates a high level of professionalism, technical maturity, and trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and vulnerability disclosure would further enhance its security posture and stakeholder confidence.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Inter, Archivo)HubSpot analytics and formsjQuery 3.5.1Typer.jsDefault.com form SDK

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

RWA.xyz operates in the intersection of finance and technology, focusing on tokenized real-world assets. Its business model revolves around providing data analytics, API services, and asset listing capabilities to a niche but growing market of digital asset professionals and institutional investors. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive data aggregation across multiple blockchains and its trusted relationships with leading financial institutions and media. Revenue streams likely include subscription or usage fees for analytics and API access, as well as fees from asset issuers for listing services. The company maintains strategic partnerships, notably with the Tokenized Asset Coalition, enhancing its ecosystem and market reach. Growth indicators include active blog content, institutional endorsements, and a clear focus on expanding platform capabilities. The company is relatively small but well-positioned within its specialized market segment.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

t*****@rwa.xyz

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and secure form handling. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No public security policies or incident response procedures are disclosed, which could limit transparency and preparedness perception. There is no vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for modern web services. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security risks are low but could be further mitigated by adopting additional headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a formal vulnerability disclosure channel.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Castle Labs, Inc. dba RWA.xyz

Description:

RWA.xyz is the industry-standard data platform for tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). The platform is used by institutions, regulators, investors, and asset issuers to analyze assets across all major public blockchains.

Key Services:
Tokenized asset analytics dashboardAPI and data downloadsAsset listing for issuers
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Inter, Archivo)HubSpot analytics and formsjQuery 3.5.1Typer.jsDefault.com form SDK
Frameworks:
Webflow
Platforms:
HubSpotGoogle Tag Manager
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form embedding via iframe
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
HubSpot AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:wihctydc@ag.us.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 22 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.rwa.xyz
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/29/2025 (22 days)
SANs:www.rwa.xyz

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(337 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.128.42, 104.21.0.178
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3037::ac43:802a, 2606:4700:3031::6815:b2
Name Servers:
danica.ns.cloudflare.com
rudy.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381134331, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:176ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern and scalable infrastructure using Webflow CMS, supported by a CDN for fast content delivery. The technology stack includes popular JavaScript libraries and integrations with HubSpot for analytics and form management, as well as Google Tag Manager for marketing and tracking. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured content. Performance is fast with no significant technical debt or legacy technology detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize security documentation to reduce technical risks. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Analyze Another Website