Skip to main content

Is safra-advokati.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - Šafra & partneři s.r.o., advokátní kancelář Reviews

safra-advokati.cz favicon

Is safra-advokati.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Šafra & partneři s.r.o., advokátní kancelář

Check if safra-advokati.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
HTMLCSSJavaScriptGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 5:44:26 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Šafra & partneři s.r.o. is a Czech law firm established in 2007 and operating since 2008, providing legal services primarily in Prague. The website presents basic but clear information about the firm, its location, and contact details. The firm targets clients seeking legal advice and services in the Czech Republic, with some content available in Italian. Technically, the website uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Hosting appears to be through Active24, a Czech hosting provider. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows basic mobile and accessibility features. Security posture is limited, with no HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected, and no privacy or cookie policies present, indicating compliance gaps. WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing a longstanding domain registration without privacy protection, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from security and compliance improvements.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSJavaScriptGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The firm operates in the legal services sector, focusing on providing advokátní kancelář (law office) services in Prague. It has a small business size with a local market focus. The business model is service-based, relying on client engagements for legal advice and representation. The website content and structure suggest a traditional law firm with moderate branding consistency. The absence of social media and limited digital marketing tools indicates a conservative digital presence. The firm uses Google Analytics for visitor insights but lacks advanced marketing or retargeting tools. The company has no visible certifications or security policies published online, which could be a competitive disadvantage in trust-building. The domain age and registrar data support a stable business presence in the Czech market.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

o*****@safra-advokati.cz

Phone Numbers (2)

+4207394*****
+4207394*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website's security posture is basic and shows several areas for improvement. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement or SSL certificate information, which is critical for protecting user data and establishing trust. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are absent, increasing risk exposure. No forms are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without visible cookie consent mechanisms, raising privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Overall, the site is low risk but lacks proactive security measures and compliance transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Šafra & partneři s.r.o., advokátní kancelář

Description:

Advokátní kancelář Šafra & partneři s.r.o. poskytuje právní služby od roku 2008, sídlí na adrese Revoluční 1082/8, 110 00 Praha 1 - Nové Město, Česká republika. Kancelář prošla rozšířením personálu a transformací na společnost s ručením omezeným v roce 2011.

Key Services:
advokátní službyzaložení společnostismlouvyprávní poradenství
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSJavaScriptGoogle Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No forms detected to collect user input

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a small Czech law firm with a professional but basic web presence.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.active24.com include:spf.smtp.cz ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.safra-advokati.cz
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:10/20/2025 (82 days)
SANs:safra-advokati.cz, www.safra-advokati.cz

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:81.95.96.75
AAAA Records:2a02:4a8:ac24:102::96:75
Name Servers:
alfa.ns.active24.czDNS only
beta.ns.active24.czDNS only
gama.ns.active24.sk
MX Records:
20: mx2.active24.com
10: mx1.active24.com
SOA:Serial: 2024091201, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.active24.com include:spf.smtp.cz ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, without modern frameworks or CMS detected. It uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Hosting is provided by Active24, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the domain registrar. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The absence of forms limits data collection but also reduces attack vectors. Technical debt is moderate due to outdated charset (windows-1250) and lack of modern web standards. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations.
Analyze Another Website