Skip to main content

Is salacaslaivas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Salacas Laivas Reviews

salacaslaivas.lv favicon

Is salacaslaivas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Salacas Laivas

Check if salacaslaivas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPressWooCommerceWPBakery Page BuilderjQueryAir Datepicker
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:31:53 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Salacas Laivas is a small Latvian company specializing in boat rentals and camping services along the Salaca river. Their offerings include canoe, kayak, SUP, and super-SUP rentals, complemented by equipment such as wetsuits. The website targets families and friends seeking recreational water activities year-round, emphasizing convenience and local natural attractions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and WPBakery, providing a functional and moderately optimized user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy for its niche but could improve security and privacy compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommerceWPBakery Page BuilderjQueryAir Datepicker

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in a niche local market focused on outdoor water recreation and camping in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in comprehensive equipment rental and trip planning services tailored to the Salaca river area. Revenue streams are primarily from direct rentals and reservations. The target customers are local and visiting families and groups interested in nature and water sports. The company maintains a simple but effective online presence without extensive marketing or tracking tools, indicating a focus on organic and direct customer engagement. Partnership or subsidiary relationships are not evident from the site.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@salacaslaivas.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712919****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure form submission practices but lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. There is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, and no advanced incident response contacts are provided. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced with standard best practices to reduce attack surface and improve user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Salacas Laivas

Description:

Salacas Laivas offers boat rentals and camping services on the Salaca river in Latvia, including canoe, kayak, SUP, and super-SUP rentals, with equipment and wetsuits provided. They cater to families and friends seeking recreational water activities year-round.

Key Services:
Boat rentals (canoe, kayak, SUP, super-SUP)Camping site rentalEquipment rental including wetsuitsReservation and trip planning
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommerceWPBakery Page BuilderjQueryAir Datepicker
Frameworks:
WooCommerceWPBakery
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Form uses POST with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.214.131.58 include:salacaslaivas.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

6 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:35.214.219.46
Name Servers:
ns1.siteground.netDNS only
ns2.siteground.netDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
10: mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
30: mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
SOA:Serial: 114, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:156ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.214.131.58 include:salacaslaivas.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and WPBakery for page building. It loads common libraries such as jQuery and Air Datepicker for UI components. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure. However, SEO and accessibility features are basic, and performance could be improved. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The hosting provider is not identifiable from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but has room for modernization and enhanced security.
Analyze Another Website