Skip to main content

Is salzburg-verkehr.at a Scam? Security Check Results - Salzburger Verkehrsverbund GmbH Reviews

salzburg-verkehr.at favicon

Is salzburg-verkehr.at Safe? Security Analysis for Salzburger Verkehrsverbund GmbH

Check if salzburg-verkehr.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationAustriamedium
WordPressYoast SEO PremiumEasy Digital DownloadsjQueryNectar Slider+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 8:33:00 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Salzburger Verkehrsverbund GmbH operates as the regional public transportation authority for the Salzburg region in Austria, providing ticketing services, schedules, and mobility solutions. The company offers a variety of ticket types including single rides, time-based passes, and special offers for students, seniors, and tourists. Their digital presence includes a comprehensive website with integrated ticket shop, timetable widgets, and mobile applications for Android and iOS, targeting public transport users in Salzburg. The company maintains active social media channels and provides clear contact and service information, positioning itself as a trusted regional transport provider. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO Premium and Easy Digital Downloads, ensuring good SEO and e-commerce capabilities. The site uses HTTPS and includes structured data for enhanced search engine understanding. Mobile optimization and accessibility are adequately addressed, though some improvements in accessibility could be made. Performance is moderate, with a well-structured navigation system and clear content presentation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure plugins, but lacks explicit security headers and publicly available incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. The domain registration is consistent with the business identity, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, Salzburger Verkehrsverbund GmbH's website demonstrates a solid digital maturity with good business credibility and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response visibility, and accessibility would further strengthen their security posture and user trust.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO PremiumEasy Digital DownloadsjQueryNectar SliderWP Media FolderHafas Widget

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a strong market position as the essential public transport provider in Salzburg, Austria. Their business model focuses on ticket sales and mobility services, targeting residents, students, seniors, and tourists. The presence of multiple ticket categories and digital sales channels indicates diversified revenue streams. Partnerships with tourism and employment sites enhance their ecosystem. The company appears medium-sized with a clear regional focus and a founding date consistent with domain age. Their digital strategy includes mobile apps and online ticketing, reflecting adaptation to modern customer needs. The website content and structure support customer self-service and information dissemination effectively.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or abuse contact information is publicly available, which is a gap in security readiness. The use of well-known WordPress plugins reduces risk but requires ongoing maintenance to prevent vulnerabilities. Privacy policies and GDPR compliance are well addressed, indicating a mature data protection approach. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header policies and incident response transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Salzburger Verkehrsverbund GmbH

Description:

Kaufen Sie heute ihre Fahrkarte für das Bundesland Salzburg | Schallmooser Hauptstraße 10 | Haltestelle Hofwirt | Postfach 74 | 5027 Salzburg

Key Services:
Ticket salesPublic transport schedules and informationMobile apps for transportCustomer service and support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO PremiumEasy Digital DownloadsjQueryNectar SliderWP Media FolderHafas Widget
Frameworks:
WordPressVisual Composer
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure plugins

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:185.5.27.114 ip4:83.243.60.167 ip4:195.192.15.203 ip4:83.64.158.244 a:webmail.salzburg-verkehr.at include:amazonses.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.flowmailer.net -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net
Forensic Reports:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:83.243.60.167
Name Servers:
server1.web4all.atDNS only
server3.web4all.atDNS only
MX Records:
0: salzburgverkehr-at02b.mail.eo.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072203, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:185.5.27.114 ip4:83.243.60.167 ip4:195.192.15.203 ip4:83.64.158.244 a:webmail.salzburg-verkehr.at include:amazonses.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.flowmailer.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a child theme of Salient, integrated with plugins such as Yoast SEO Premium for SEO optimization, Easy Digital Downloads for e-commerce functionality, and WP Media Folder for media management. The site uses jQuery and custom JavaScript for interactive elements including a timetable widget (Hafas). The presence of structured data (JSON-LD) improves search engine indexing and rich results. Performance is moderate with preloaded fonts and optimized images, though some scripts and stylesheets could be deferred or combined for faster load times. Mobile responsiveness is good, with adaptive layouts and visible mobile-specific content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience with opportunities for performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website