Skip to main content

Is samayam.com a Scam? Security Check Results - samayam.com Reviews

S

Is samayam.com Safe? Security Analysis for samayam.com

Check if samayam.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:59:21 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.samayam.com is currently inaccessible, presenting an Access Denied error page with no visible content or metadata. The WHOIS lookup indicates that the domain is not registered or the registration data is unavailable, suggesting the domain may be expired or unregistered. Due to the lack of accessible content, no business information, contact details, or security policies can be identified. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with no detectable technologies or frameworks. Security posture is weak given the absence of HTTPS and security headers, and the site is likely protected or blocked by a generic WAF or access control mechanism. Overall, the site cannot be reliably analyzed for business credibility or compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the current state of the website. The absence of content, metadata, or WHOIS data prevents assessment of market positioning, business model, or partnerships. There are no visible revenue streams, customer segments, or growth indicators. The domain status suggests it is inactive or not maintained.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor due to lack of HTTPS, missing security headers, and no visible security or privacy policies. The site is blocked by a WAF or access control, which may provide some protection but also prevents legitimate access and analysis. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain's unregistered or expired status further undermines trust and security.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register or renew the domain to establish ownership and legitimacy.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page content shows an XML error with <Code>AccessDenied</Code> and minimal HTML content indicating blocked access, likely due to WAF or permission restrictions.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
10/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked with Access Denied error

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:203.55.102.30 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

80/100
Score

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:videoplayer.indiatimes.com
Issuer:DigiCert Global G3 TLS ECC SHA384 2020 CA1
Valid Until:3/4/2026 (180 days)
SANs:advice.magicbricks.com, agent.magicbricks.com, ahmedabadmirror.indiatimes.com +84 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: smtp1.sendpal.in

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: smtp2.sendpal.in

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(296 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:23.52.23.190
AAAA Records:2a02:26f0:e80:59f::216f, 2a02:26f0:e80:584::216f
Name Servers:
ns11.constellix.com
ns21.constellix.com
ns31.constellix.com
ns41.constellix.net
ns51.constellix.net
ns61.constellix.net
MX Records:
10: smtp1.sendpal.in
20: smtp2.sendpal.in
SOA:Serial: 2015010460, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:75ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:203.55.102.30 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves an XML error message indicating access denial, with no HTML content, metadata, or scripts. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The lack of HTTPS and security headers indicates minimal technical implementation. The site likely uses a generic WAF or access control mechanism blocking access. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to lack of content.
Analyze Another Website