Skip to main content

Is samhsa.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - samhsa.gov Reviews

S

Is samhsa.gov Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if samhsa.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentN/alarge
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 6:48:29 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website samhsa.gov appears to be a government domain with a long registration history dating back to 1997, indicating an established entity. However, the website content is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content, which prevents any meaningful content or metadata analysis. This lack of access also means no privacy, cookie, or security policies are available, and no contact or incident response information can be extracted. The domain's WHOIS data shows privacy protection, which is unusual for government domains but may be justified for security reasons. Overall, the website's digital presence is currently blocked or restricted, limiting the ability to assess its technical infrastructure or business operations.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the inaccessible website content, detailed business intelligence is unavailable. The domain name and WHOIS data suggest it is a government entity, likely providing public health or substance abuse-related services. The domain age supports a mature organization. No information about market positioning, partnerships, or business model could be derived from the data provided.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of accessible content and absence of security headers or SSL configuration details. The domain status includes serverTransferProhibited, which is a positive indicator of domain security. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a potential area for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published. The 403 Forbidden response may indicate restrictive access controls, but it also limits transparency and user access.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Investigate and resolve the 403 Forbidden error to allow public access to the website content.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content, indicating access is blocked or restricted. No specific WAF vendor identified.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:52.45.112.110 ip4:96.127.38.109 ip4:96.127.48.54 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:8idhoybh@ag.us.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:8idhoybh@fr.us.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:samhsa.gov
Issuer:HydrantID Server CA O1
Valid Until:2/16/2026 (199 days)
SANs:samhsa.gov, www.samhsa.gov

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(34 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:158.71.215.157, 158.71.215.158
AAAA Records:2607:f220:600:1::c16
Name Servers:
a.samhsa.gov
b.samhsa.gov
MX Records:
10: primary.us.etp.fireeyegov.com
20: alt1.us.etp.fireeyegov.com
40: alt3.us.etp.fireeyegov.com
30: alt2.us.etp.fireeyegov.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073001, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:52.45.112.110 ip4:96.127.38.109 ip4:96.127.48.54 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a minimal 403 Forbidden page with no metadata, scripts, or visible technologies. No CMS or frameworks could be detected. The domain is registered with get.gov and uses custom name servers. DNSSEC is not enabled. Hosting provider details are not available. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. The technical infrastructure appears minimal or restricted, possibly due to security policies or misconfiguration.
Analyze Another Website