Skip to main content

Is sansi.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA tirdzniecības uzņēmums ”SANSI” Reviews

sansi.lv favicon

Is sansi.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA tirdzniecības uzņēmums ”SANSI”

Check if sansi.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
jQuery 1.9.1jQuery UI 1.10.3Nivo SliderGoogle Fonts (Open Sans)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:50:28 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SANSI is a Latvian retail and service company specializing in equipment sales, installation, servicing, and project planning. The website targets Latvian customers and provides multilingual support in Latvian, Russian, and English. The business appears to be a small-sized local player with a focus on retail and related services. The website infrastructure relies on older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.9.1 and jQuery UI 1.10.3, along with the Nivo Slider plugin and Google Fonts. The site shows basic mobile optimization and moderate performance but lacks modern CMS or advanced frameworks. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers and use of outdated libraries posing potential risks. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating low privacy compliance. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is functional but requires modernization and improved security and privacy practices.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.9.1jQuery UI 1.10.3Nivo SliderGoogle Fonts (Open Sans)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the retail sector within Latvia, offering equipment and related services including installation and servicing. The business model appears to be a combination of B2B and B2C, targeting local customers. The website content and structure suggest a moderate market position with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Revenue streams likely come from equipment sales and service contracts. The absence of advanced analytics or marketing tools indicates a limited digital marketing strategy. The company maintains direct contact channels but lacks visible certifications or trust badges. Growth potential may be enhanced by improving digital presence and security compliance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@sansi.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716722****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. The use of outdated jQuery 1.9.1 introduces known vulnerabilities that could be exploited. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk of injection attacks, but the overall security hygiene is weak. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, suggesting limited preparedness for security incidents. Recommendations include updating libraries, implementing security headers, and establishing privacy and incident response policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA tirdzniecības uzņēmums ”SANSI”

Description:

SANSI is a Latvian company engaged in retail and services related to equipment, installation, servicing, and project planning.

Key Services:
ServissIekārtasMontāžaProjektēšana
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.9.1jQuery UI 1.10.3Nivo SliderGoogle Fonts (Open Sans)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
45/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical link (https://www.sansi.lv/)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'default' uses 1008-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.203 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:91.203.68.192/28 +ip4:85.31.97.194 +ip4:85.31.97.38 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1008-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.203
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: sansi.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025061100, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.203 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:91.203.68.192/28 +ip4:85.31.97.194 +ip4:85.31.97.38 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.9.1 and jQuery UI 1.10.3, which are outdated and potentially vulnerable. The Nivo Slider plugin is used for image slideshows. Google Fonts are loaded for typography. No modern CMS or frameworks were detected. The site uses basic HTML and CSS with inline styles and linked stylesheets. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization techniques observed. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tag present but no advanced responsive design features detected. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO optimization is basic with a canonical link and meta viewport but no Open Graph or structured data found. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website