Skip to main content

Is saulespulkstenis.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - saulespulkstenis.lv Reviews

saulespulkstenis.lv favicon

Is saulespulkstenis.lv Safe? Security Analysis for saulespulkstenis.lv – Īsti saules pulksteņi

Check if saulespulkstenis.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPress 6.7.2JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:39:09 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.saulespulkstenis.lv is a niche cultural and educational platform dedicated to sundials in Latvia. It provides information about sundial culture, exhibitions, maps of sundials across Latvia, and contact options for sundial owners or interested parties. The site appears to be small-scale and community-focused without commercial intent. Technically, it is built on WordPress 6.7.2, uses standard web technologies, and is accessible with HTTPS enabled. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO basics but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and incident response contact information. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy for general audiences, and free from adult or explicit content.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.7.2JavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model is informational and cultural promotion, targeting enthusiasts, educational institutions, and local communities interested in sundials. The website holds a niche market position in Latvia with no evident commercial activities or partnerships. The absence of contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links limits direct engagement and business credibility. The site’s content quality and branding are consistent and relevant to its audience. Growth potential may be limited due to the specialized focus and lack of broader marketing or monetization strategies.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit insights into user behavior. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security best practices and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Website focused on sundials (saules pulksteņi) culture, information, exhibitions, and locations in Latvia. It provides resources about sundials, exhibitions like “Saules laiks”, and contact options for sundial owners or interested parties.

Key Services:
Information about sundialsExhibition detailsMap of sundials in LatviaContact and support for sundial owners
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.7.2JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx include:spf.serveris.lv ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.111.50.68
Name Servers:
ns1.serveris.lvDNS only
ns2.serveris.lvDNS only
ns3.serveris.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: sa.serveris.lv
20: sa2.serveris.lv
SOA:Serial: 2023032800, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:89ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx include:spf.serveris.lv ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with standard themes and scripts. It uses modern web standards including responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no obvious broken elements. The site lacks advanced technical SEO metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. No external analytics or marketing tools are integrated, which simplifies privacy but limits marketing insights. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The site could benefit from technical modernization including enhanced SEO metadata, security headers, and performance optimizations.
Analyze Another Website