Skip to main content

Is saulessveces.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA SAULES SVECES Reviews

saulessveces.lv favicon

Is saulessveces.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA SAULES SVECES

Check if saulessveces.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
Google AnalyticsVue.jsjQueryToastr.jsSwiper.js+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:05:55 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA SAULES SVECES operates an e-commerce website focused on retailing scented and decorative candles, gift sets, and related products primarily targeting the Latvian market. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and content relevant to its business domain. It offers multilingual support (Latvian and English) and includes standard e-commerce features such as product listings, shopping cart, and checkout processes. The company maintains active social media profiles on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing its market presence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Vue.js for frontend interactivity, Google Analytics for traffic monitoring, and uses CDN-hosted libraries such as jQuery and Toastr.js. The site is served over HTTPS with no visible security warnings, indicating a secure transport layer. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are adequately implemented, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the website demonstrates basic best practices such as HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms. However, there is a lack of advanced security headers and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information suggest a legitimate small business operation. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with good business credibility and moderate technical maturity. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and WHOIS data availability would enhance trust and compliance posture.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsVue.jsjQueryToastr.jsSwiper.jsGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a niche retailer specializing in scented candles and related gift products within Latvia. Its business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce supplemented by physical store presence at Kungu iela 6, Liepāja. The target customer segment includes general consumers seeking decorative and aromatic candles for various occasions. The website's multilingual support indicates an intent to reach broader audiences, including English speakers. The presence of workshops (Meistarklases) suggests additional revenue streams and community engagement. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and customer interaction. No evidence of parent or subsidiary relationships was found, indicating an independent small business. The business appears to maintain a consistent brand image and trustworthy online presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@saulessveces.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712955****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, reflecting compliance with basic privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No dedicated security policy or incident response contact information is published, limiting transparency in security governance. The use of third-party libraries such as jQuery and Toastr.js should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. No signs of exposed sensitive data or malicious content were detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust assessment. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced header configurations, documented policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA SAULES SVECES

Description:

Svētkiem, romantiskiem vakariem, relaksācijai vai vienkārši ikdienas iekrāsošanai un akcentēšanai – tik atšķirīgs var būt aromātisko „Saules Sveču” pielietojums.

Key Services:
Sale of scented candlesSale of decorative candlesSale of gift setsWorkshops (Meistarklases)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsVue.jsjQueryToastr.jsSwiper.jsGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
Vue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Toastr.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:51.15.221.209
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1657113590, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:271ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Vue.js for reactive UI components and Swiper.js for sliders. Google Fonts and CDN-hosted libraries optimize resource loading. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, supporting a positive user experience on various devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small retail e-commerce site but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Analyze Another Website