Is sc.gov Safe? Security Analysis for ERROR: The request could not be satisfied
Check if sc.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website sc.gov is a government domain established in 2002, indicating a long-standing presence. However, the current content is inaccessible due to an Amazon CloudFront Web Application Firewall (WAF) blocking access from the user's country, resulting in a 403 error page. This prevents any meaningful extraction of website content, metadata, or business information. The domain WHOIS data shows privacy protection enabled, which is uncommon but may be justified for security reasons in a government context. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers is a minor concern but cannot be fully assessed due to the blocked content. Overall, the site appears legitimate based on domain age and TLD, but the inability to access content limits the analysis.
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Due to the blocked content, no direct business intelligence can be gathered from the website. The domain suggests a government entity likely serving the state of South Carolina. The lack of visible content or metadata prevents assessment of market positioning, services, or partnerships. The domain's longevity and .gov TLD imply an essential government service provider role.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to the blocked content. The presence of a CloudFront WAF indicates some level of security hardening. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided HTML. The domain uses HTTPS as implied by CloudFront usage, but SSL configuration details are unavailable. No vulnerabilities or incident response information can be assessed. Privacy protection in WHOIS is noted but unusual for government domains.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Review and adjust CloudFront WAF geo-blocking rules to allow legitimate access for security analysts and users.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
CloudFront Detected
The Amazon CloudFront distribution is configured to block access from your country, resulting in a 403 ERROR page.
Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com
Business Insights
poor
Technical Stack
Security Assessment
0Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website content is inaccessible due to CloudFront WAF blocking access from the user's country.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings