Skip to main content

Is scdot.org a Scam? Security Check Results - South Carolina Department of Transportation Reviews

scdot.org favicon

Is scdot.org Safe? Security Analysis for South Carolina Department of Transportation

Check if scdot.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationUnited Stateslarge
jQuery 2.2.4Bootstrap 3.3.7JW PlayerGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA+1 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 5:38:11 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) operates as a government agency responsible for managing and maintaining the state's transportation infrastructure, including highways and roadways. The website serves as a comprehensive resource for residents, travelers, and businesses in South Carolina, providing information on transportation planning, road projects, travel advisories, and business opportunities related to transportation. The site positions itself as an authoritative source for transportation-related information within the state. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), leveraging technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, JW Player, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile-optimized with a moderate performance profile and includes accessibility features, though some improvements could be made. The presence of multiple analytics and tracking tools indicates a moderate level of user data collection. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms from bots. However, it lacks visible security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for enhancing security and privacy compliance. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is common for government entities but limits external verification of domain legitimacy. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with good security practices but could improve in privacy compliance and security header implementation. The domain appears legitimate and trustworthy based on content and branding. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, and publishing security policies to strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.2.4Bootstrap 3.3.7JW PlayerGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHAAdobe Helix RUM

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SCDOT holds a strong market position as the official state transportation authority, serving a large audience including residents, businesses, and government stakeholders. Its business model is focused on public service and infrastructure management rather than commercial revenue generation. The agency benefits from a clear partnership ecosystem with related state initiatives such as movingsouthcarolinaforward.com and internal apps. The website content and structure support transparency and public engagement, which are critical for government agencies. Growth indicators include ongoing projects and public presentations. The lack of commercial advertising and affiliate programs aligns with its government status.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (2)

855*******
803*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of the SCDOT website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA is implemented. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the site is secure for general public use but could benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

South Carolina Department of Transportation

Description:

South Carolina Department of Transportation website providing information to the public about highways and roadways throughout the state.

Key Services:
Transportation planningRoad and bridge maintenancePublic information disseminationTravel and business resources
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.2.4Bootstrap 3.3.7JW PlayerGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHAAdobe Helix RUM
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Siteimprove AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Siteimprove Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:167.89.67.200 ip4:216.71.145.17 ip4:216.71.146.72 ip4:216.71.146.73 ip4:216.71.145.19 ip4:4.152.136.78 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature CMS platform (Adobe Experience Manager) with a technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and JW Player. It uses Google Tag Manager and Siteimprove Analytics for tracking and performance monitoring. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization by reducing third-party script load. The absence of visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates some technical debt in security and privacy compliance. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses HTTPS correctly, which is a strong foundation. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and enhance user privacy controls.
Analyze Another Website