Skip to main content

Is sciencearticles.cc a Scam? Security Check Results - sciencearticles.cc Reviews

S

Is sciencearticles.cc Safe? Security Analysis for Science articles--Featured scientific articles

Check if sciencearticles.cc is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 2:21:47 AM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website sciencearticles.cc presents itself as a multilingual aggregator of scientific articles but the actual content and article titles suggest a focus on gaming-related topics, which undermines its credibility. The site lacks fundamental business information, contact details, and legal policies such as privacy or cookie policies. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or CMS detected. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, indicating a weak security posture. No analytics or tracking technologies are present, and no social media or contact emails are found, limiting user engagement and trust. Overall, the site appears to be a low-quality content aggregator with potential spammy characteristics and insufficient compliance or security measures.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model appears to be content aggregation across multiple languages, but the content quality and relevance are poor, with gaming-related article titles inconsistent with the scientific theme. The lack of contact information, policies, and certifications suggests a low level of professionalism and limited market presence. External links include suspicious numeric domains, which may indicate low trust partnerships or spam. The target audience is unclear due to inconsistent content. There is no indication of revenue streams, partnerships, or growth indicators. The site likely operates as a small-scale or hobby project rather than a professional scientific publication platform.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak, with no HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected. No forms or inputs are present to assess for secure handling of user data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS data without clear business justification adds to the trust concerns. Overall, the site is vulnerable to interception and lacks basic security hygiene, posing risks to users and undermining trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to aggregate and provide access to scientific articles in multiple languages, including Portuguese, Spanish, Italian, Danish, Finnish, Norwegian, and Swedish. The content includes links to articles that appear to be gaming-related or possibly spammy in nature, with titles referencing 'darkscape gold' and 'RS gold' which are gaming terms unrelated to scientific content.

Key Services:
Multilingual article aggregationLinking to external articles
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website lacks privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:sciencearticles.cc
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/28/2025 (86 days)
SANs:sciencearticles.cc, *.sciencearticles.cc

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:188.114.96.1, 188.114.97.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3035::ac43:ba2a, 2606:4700:3034::6815:137c
Name Servers:
patryk.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
tara.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2379472504, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses simple HTML and CSS without detectable modern frameworks or CMS. The site is moderately performant but lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is poor due to missing meta tags and structured data. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, limiting insights into user behavior. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. The site would benefit from modernization, including responsive design, SEO improvements, and enhanced accessibility to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Analyze Another Website