Skip to main content

Is sciencedirect.com a Scam? Security Check Results - sciencedirect.com Reviews

sciencedirect.com favicon

Is sciencedirect.com Safe? Security Analysis for Just a moment...

Check if sciencedirect.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:23:26 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.sciencedirect.com is currently inaccessible due to a security challenge or WAF mechanism, as indicated by the page title 'Just a moment...' and the lack of actual content. This prevents a full analysis of the business, technical infrastructure, and security posture. The WHOIS query returned no match for the domain, which is unusual for a well-known commercial site, suggesting either a limitation in the WHOIS data source or privacy protection. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies were detected in the accessible content, nor were any contact details or social media links. The security headers and SSL configuration could not be assessed due to lack of content. Overall, the site appears to be protected by a security mechanism that blocks automated or high-volume queries, limiting visibility into its operations and security.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the blocked content, no direct business intelligence data could be extracted. The domain www.sciencedirect.com is known to be associated with Elsevier, a major academic publishing company, suggesting a business model focused on providing scientific literature and research content. However, no explicit business details, market positioning, or partnership information could be confirmed from the accessible data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to the content being blocked by a WAF or similar security challenge. No security headers or SSL details were available for analysis. The presence of a security challenge page indicates some level of security awareness and protection against automated access or attacks. However, the lack of accessible security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information limits the assessment of the site's overall security maturity and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement mechanisms to allow legitimate automated security and compliance analysis while maintaining protection against malicious actors.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The HTML content indicates a security challenge page with title 'Just a moment...' and meta tags related to TDM policy, no actual website content is accessible. This is typical of a WAF or security challenge blocking access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a security mechanism (WAF or similar).

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2678400; preload"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

22/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:80.64.57.21/30 a:rsevps20.ritense.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:reed-elsevier@rua.agari.com
Forensic Reports:reed-elsevier@ruf.agari.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:203.22.241.10, 203.22.241.8, 203.22.241.11, 203.22.241.9
Name Servers:
elmo.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
sofia.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: sciencedirect-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2382549430, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:80.64.57.21/30 a:rsevps20.ritense.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The technical infrastructure could not be assessed due to the website content being blocked by a security challenge. No information about the technology stack, CMS, hosting provider, or performance characteristics was available. The presence of meta tags related to text and data mining policy suggests some compliance with content usage policies, but no further technical details could be extracted.
Analyze Another Website