Skip to main content

Is scnem2.com a Scam? Security Check Results - SC-Networks GmbH Reviews

S

Is scnem2.com Safe? Security Analysis for SC-Networks GmbH

https://scnem2.com

Check if scnem2.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanysmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScript
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 1:29:33 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SC-Networks GmbH operates a marketing automation platform branded as Evalanche, with the analyzed website serving as a login portal for existing users. The site is minimalistic, focusing on secure user authentication without public-facing content or marketing information. The technical infrastructure leverages AWS DNS services and standard web technologies, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is basic, with HTTPS usage implied but lacking advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy and compliance disclosures are absent, which may pose regulatory risks. Overall, the site is functional but lacks transparency and comprehensive security measures.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets B2B customers requiring marketing automation solutions. The business model centers on SaaS delivery of Evalanche services. Market positioning and competitive advantages cannot be fully assessed due to limited public content. The domain age and registration data support legitimacy and operational history since 2013. Partnerships with Evalanche-related domains suggest an integrated service ecosystem. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not publicly visible. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved compliance and customer trust signals.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Current security maturity is basic with HTTPS enforced but missing critical security headers and DNSSEC. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Data protection practices are unclear, and no contact channels for security incidents are disclosed. The login form uses standard input fields without visible advanced protections. Recommendations include enhancing DNS security, implementing security headers, and publishing compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SC-Networks GmbH

Description:

The website appears to be a login portal for SC-Networks GmbH, a company associated with marketing automation platforms (Evalanche). No detailed business description is present on the page.

Key Services:
Marketing Automation Platform access
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by form action URL https://scnem2.com/)
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Evalanche Marketing Automation Platform
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a login portal with minimal public content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:_spf.senders.scnem.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 17 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(16 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:80.190.118.178
Name Servers:
ns-1035.awsdns-01.org
ns-1965.awsdns-53.co.uk
ns-333.awsdns-41.com
ns-683.awsdns-21.net
MX Records:
100: mx1.scnem2.com
100: mx2.scnem2.com
100: mx3.scnem2.com
100: mx4.scnem2.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx include:_spf.senders.scnem.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS detected. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, providing reliable DNS services. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization or accessibility features noted. SEO is minimal due to lack of meta tags and structured data. The login form is straightforward but could benefit from enhanced UX and security features. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist to improve compliance, security, and user experience.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about scnem2.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website