Skip to main content

Is sconto.sk a Scam? Security Check Results - sconto.sk Reviews

S

Is sconto.sk Safe? Security Analysis for Human Verification

Check if sconto.sk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherSlovakiasmall
AWS WAFJavaScriptAmazon Ember font
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 7:02:52 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website sconto.sk is currently inaccessible due to an AWS WAF security challenge page requiring CAPTCHA verification. This prevents direct analysis of the actual website content and business information. The domain is registered since 2008 with a reputable registrar and DNSSEC enabled, indicating a legitimate and mature domain. The visible page is a human verification challenge designed to block bots and automated access, served by Amazon AWS infrastructure. No business, contact, or policy information is visible on this page. The technical setup shows use of AWS WAF and Amazon hosting, but no further CMS or platform details are available. Security posture is limited to the presence of DNSSEC and WAF protection, but no visible security headers or policies are found. Overall, the site cannot be fully analyzed due to the blocking mechanism, resulting in a low AI score and limited insights.

Detected Technologies

AWS WAFJavaScriptAmazon Ember font

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the WAF challenge blocking access, no direct business intelligence data such as company name, services, or market positioning could be extracted. The domain age and registration data suggest a stable presence in Slovakia since 2008. The domain name suggests a retail or e-commerce business (Sconto is a known furniture retailer brand in some regions), but this cannot be confirmed from the blocked content. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. No contact or marketing information is available to assess customer segments or revenue streams.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs AWS WAF with CAPTCHA challenge to mitigate automated attacks and bots, which is a strong security control. DNSSEC is enabled, enhancing DNS security. However, no other security headers or policies are visible. The lack of visible privacy, cookie, or incident response policies indicates compliance gaps. The blocking mechanism prevents assessment of SSL/TLS configuration and other security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected on the challenge page. Overall, the security posture is moderate but incomplete due to limited visibility.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a user-friendly CAPTCHA challenge that allows search engines and legitimate users easier access to content after verification.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The page is a security challenge CAPTCHA page served by AWS WAF, blocking direct access to website content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
AWS WAFJavaScriptAmazon Ember font
Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0
Best Practices:
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind an AWS WAF CAPTCHA challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:93.122.66.138/32 ip4:193.86.103.32 ip4:95.168.192.139 ip4:78.24.14.178 ip4:78.24.14.176 ip4:78.24.14.177 ip4:194.213.202.42 include:_mailsystem.netsystems.cz include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_emailing.heureka.cz -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1392-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:89af84a246@rua.easydmarc.eu
Forensic Reports:89af84a246@ruf.easydmarc.eu

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.206.29, 3.164.206.59, 3.164.206.110, 3.164.206.89
Name Servers:
ns-1489.awsdns-58.orgDNS only
ns-1557.awsdns-02.co.ukDNS only
ns-226.awsdns-28.comDNS only
ns-905.awsdns-49.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: sconto-sk.mail.eo.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:56ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:93.122.66.138/32 ip4:193.86.103.32 ip4:95.168.192.139 ip4:78.24.14.178 ip4:78.24.14.176 ip4:78.24.14.177 ip4:194.213.202.42 include:_mailsystem.netsystems.cz include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_emailing.heureka.cz -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure with AWS WAF providing security filtering and CAPTCHA challenges. The page uses JavaScript and Amazon Ember font for UI elements. No CMS or frameworks are detectable from the challenge page. The page is minimal and focused solely on bot mitigation, lacking SEO metadata, structured data, or business content. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to content blocking. Accessibility is basic with some keyboard focus styling. The technical setup is modern but limits user experience due to aggressive bot filtering.
Analyze Another Website