Skip to main content

Is scottandrew.co.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - EXANTE LTD. Reviews

scottandrew.co.uk favicon

Is scottandrew.co.uk Safe? Security Analysis for EXANTE LTD.

Check if scottandrew.co.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceMaltamedium
HTML5CSSJavaScriptGoogle Fonts (Source Sans Pro)
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 9:34:46 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website scottandrew.co.uk serves as an aggregator platform providing detailed reviews and information about the EXANTE brokerage firm. EXANTE LTD., founded in 2011 and regulated by MFSA, CySEC, and MiFID, offers a multi-asset trading platform with access to over 400,000 financial instruments globally. The site presents comprehensive business descriptions, customer testimonials, and detailed fee structures, targeting investors and traders seeking professional brokerage services. Technically, the site is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, hosted via GoDaddy, and uses HTTPS for secure communication. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which are important for compliance and trust. The security posture is moderate with no evident vulnerabilities but could be improved by adding security best practices and compliance documentation. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact channels.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSJavaScriptGoogle Fonts (Source Sans Pro)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

EXANTE positions itself as a reputable brokerage with a strong regulatory framework and a broad offering of financial instruments. Its business model focuses on providing access to global markets through a proprietary platform requiring a significant minimum deposit, targeting serious investors and professional traders. The website content emphasizes transparency, customer service, and technical robustness, supported by positive user reviews. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting business credibility. However, the lack of direct contact information and privacy documentation may limit user trust and regulatory compliance. The site does not appear to engage in aggressive advertising or tracking, indicating a focus on organic user engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security events. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. The site does not appear to collect user data via forms, reducing attack surface. Overall, security practices are adequate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, privacy documentation, and incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

EXANTE LTD.

Description:

EXANTE is a brokerage firm founded in 2011, offering access to over 400,000 financial instruments across more than 50 global trading venues. It provides a multi-currency trading platform with advanced proprietary technology and investor protection. The broker requires a minimum deposit of 10,000 EUR and is regulated by MFSA, CySEC, and MiFID.

Key Services:
Multi-asset trading platformAccess to global marketsBrokerage account servicesMobile trading appDemo trading account
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSJavaScriptGoogle Fonts (Source Sans Pro)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is an aggregator of customer reviews about EXANTE brokerage.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:scottandrew.co.uk
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/20/2025 (80 days)
SANs:scottandrew.co.uk, *.scottandrew.co.uk

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(74 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.85.111, 172.67.204.210
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3035::6815:556f, 2606:4700:3034::ac43:ccd2
Name Servers:
melinda.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
yadiel.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2378679835, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:51ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, including Google Fonts for typography. It is hosted under a domain registered with GoDaddy, indicating a reputable hosting provider. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is supported by meta description and hreflang tags for multilingual support. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. There are no analytics or tracking scripts found, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks advanced technical security measures such as security headers and structured data beyond basic schema.org aggregate ratings. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but basic, with room for modernization and enhanced security.
Analyze Another Website