Skip to main content

Is scrt.network a Scam? Security Check Results - Secret Network Reviews

scrt.network favicon

Is scrt.network Safe? Security Analysis for Secret Network

Check if scrt.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Framer (website builder)Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:58:25 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Secret Network operates as a blockchain platform specializing in confidential computing within the Web3 ecosystem. It enables developers to build decentralized applications that handle encrypted data, emphasizing privacy and security. The website reflects a medium-sized technology entity with a consistent brand and professional presentation, targeting developers and privacy-conscious users in the blockchain space. The business model centers on providing a privacy-preserving infrastructure layer for decentralized applications, positioning itself as a niche player in the blockchain industry.

Detected Technologies

Framer (website builder)Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company leverages a modern web presence built with Framer and integrates Google Analytics for user insights. While the website content is relevant and professionally designed, it lacks explicit contact information, privacy policies, and terms of service, which are critical for trust and compliance. The absence of registrant details in WHOIS data is typical for privacy-focused blockchain projects but limits transparency. The platform likely generates revenue through blockchain services and developer engagement, targeting a specialized market segment within the broader Web3 community.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks visible security headers that enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which aligns with the privacy-centric nature of the business but reduces registrant transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Secret Network

Description:

The Confidential Computing Layer of Web3 Secret Network enables developers to build decentralized applications with encrypted data.

Key Services:
Confidential computing layerEncrypted data handling for decentralized applications
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer (website builder)Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and focused on blockchain privacy technology

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:44462531.spf08.hubspotemail.net
DNS Lookups:1/10
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@scrt.network

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:31.43.161.6, 31.43.160.6
Name Servers:
darl.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
penny.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2380849341, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:197ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:44462531.spf08.hubspotemail.net

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design platform, and utilizes Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and analytics respectively. The site loads external resources from trusted domains and uses HTTPS exclusively, indicating good baseline security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. However, the lack of security headers and privacy compliance documentation suggests technical debt in security and regulatory adherence. There is an opportunity to modernize security practices and improve transparency to align with industry standards.
Analyze Another Website