Skip to main content

Is secret.network a Scam? Security Check Results - secret.network Reviews

S

Is secret.network Safe? Security Analysis for ZOMBO

Check if secret.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSSJavaScriptFont Awesome 4.2.0
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:12:02 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Zombo.com is a minimalistic novelty website with no clear business purpose or service offering. The site features a simple animated spinning wheel and an audio loop, serving primarily as a humorous or nostalgic internet artifact rather than a commercial or informational platform. The domain is long-registered since 1999 and maintained without privacy protection, but the website content does not reflect a mature or professional business presence. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Font Awesome icons and is hosted on Liquid Web infrastructure. Mobile responsiveness is implemented via viewport meta tags, but overall design and content quality are poor. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers or privacy policies, and no analytics or tracking scripts are present. The site does not provide any contact or compliance information, limiting its business credibility and privacy compliance. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences but lacks professionalism and security maturity.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSJavaScriptFont Awesome 4.2.0

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website does not represent an active business entity or commercial operation. There are no services, products, or business descriptions provided. The domain's longevity suggests it may be a legacy or novelty domain rather than an active business asset. There are no partnerships, subsidiaries, or business relationships indicated. The lack of contact information and policies further indicates no formal business operations. The site targets a general audience interested in internet culture or humor rather than customers or clients.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement information, security headers, and privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The domain is registered without privacy protection but shows no suspicious patterns. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also indicate minimal security or compliance focus. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, implementing HTTPS if not already done, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be a humorous or novelty site with minimal content, featuring an animated spinning wheel image and an audio loop. There is no business description or service offering.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSJavaScriptFont Awesome 4.2.0
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a minimal novelty/humor site with no business content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:50.28.52.163 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default0
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 49 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(398 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:50.28.52.163
Name Servers:
ns.liquidweb.com
ns1.liquidweb.com
MX Records:
0: zombo.com
SOA:Serial: 2021012603, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:50.28.52.163 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, including Font Awesome icons loaded from a CDN. It uses meta viewport tags for mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS. Hosting is inferred to be Liquid Web based on nameservers. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta descriptions, Open Graph tags, or structured data. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The site is simple and low risk but also lacks modern technical features and security best practices.
Analyze Another Website