Skip to main content

Is secretcitytrails.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Secret City Trails Reviews

secretcitytrails.com favicon

Is secretcitytrails.com Safe? Security Analysis for Secret City Trails

Check if secretcitytrails.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
WordPressWooCommercejQueryGoogle Tag ManagerCookieYes+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:01:51 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Secret City Trails is a niche experiential tourism company offering playful city discovery walks and games across over 50 European cities. Their platform is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, integrating modern web technologies and strong SEO practices. The website demonstrates good privacy compliance with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR adherence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie management, though explicit security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, the site is professional, user-friendly, and trustworthy from a content and technical perspective.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommercejQueryGoogle Tag ManagerCookieYesLeaflet (map library)Yoast SEO

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets tourists, locals, and corporate clients seeking engaging city exploration experiences. Their business model centers on e-commerce sales of digital city games and team building activities. They maintain a strong social media presence and customer trust through reviews and privacy transparency. The lack of direct contact information on the site may limit immediate customer support visibility. Partnerships with payment processors like Stripe are evident. Growth potential lies in expanding city coverage and enhancing direct customer engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent tools to comply with privacy regulations. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust. Overall, the security posture is good but can be strengthened with additional headers and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Secret City Trails

Description:

Secret City Trails reinvents city exploration through playful Discovery Walks featuring riddles and local stories in over 50 European cities.

Key Services:
Discovery WalksCity gamesTeam building activitiesGift cards and bundles
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommercejQueryGoogle Tag ManagerCookieYesLeaflet (map library)Yoast SEO
Frameworks:
WooCommerceYoast SEO
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsSourcebuster
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Sourcebuster
Marketing Tools:
WooCommerce Multicurrency
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mailgun.org include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.135.42
Name Servers:
ns35.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns36.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2024052200, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:140ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mailgun.org include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, enhanced by Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates Google Tag Manager and analytics tools for marketing insights. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed. The use of Leaflet for interactive maps adds user engagement. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Analyze Another Website