Skip to main content

Is securefi.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Private by Design, LLC Reviews

securefi.io favicon

Is securefi.io Safe? Security Analysis for Private by Design, LLC

Check if securefi.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
WebflowGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:40:36 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SecureFi is a newly established event organizer specializing in Web3 security conferences and Capture The Flag (CTF) competitions, targeting elite Web3 security researchers and blockchain developers. The company operates primarily in the technology sector and is based in the United States. Their flagship event is scheduled for July 2024 in Brussels, featuring a strong lineup of industry speakers and sponsors, positioning them as a niche player in the decentralized security innovation space. The business model revolves around event ticket sales and sponsorships, leveraging partnerships with related conferences such as Encrypt.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SecureFi's market positioning is focused on the growing demand for Web3 security expertise and community engagement. Their competitive advantage lies in hosting hands-on, technical events with significant prize pools and industry participation. The company benefits from a partnership ecosystem including event platforms like Eventbrite and sister conferences. Growth indicators include a well-curated speaker list and sponsorship from reputable Web3 security firms. The business targets a specialized audience of security professionals and ethical hackers, with revenue streams primarily from ticket sales and sponsorship packages.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit security policies indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests limited incident response readiness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security culture appears nascent but aligned with industry expectations for event organizations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Private by Design, LLC

Description:

SecureFi is a hands-on Web3 hacking and security research event focused on decentralized security innovation, featuring technical talks, workshops, panel discussions, and CTF competitions.

Key Services:
Web3 security summitCTF competitions with prize poolsWorkshops and panel discussionsNetworking opportunities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Webflow CMS
Platforms:
Webflow Hosting
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional event site for a Web3 security summit in Brussels scheduled for July 2024

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

20/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(240 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:16.16.119.222, 51.21.126.187, 13.49.111.177
Name Servers:
guy.ns.cloudflare.com
mira.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382647089, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting is managed by Webflow with DNS through Cloudflare, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices, with a professional design and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, typical for CMS-based event sites. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement advanced security configurations to reduce technical risks.
Analyze Another Website